Referral frequency, attrition rate, and outcomes of germline testing in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Aged
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
/ diagnosis
Female
Genetic Counseling
/ statistics & numerical data
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genetic Testing
/ statistics & numerical data
Germ-Line Mutation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Referral and Consultation
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Genetic counseling
Germline testing
Pancreatic cancer
Journal
Familial cancer
ISSN: 1573-7292
Titre abrégé: Fam Cancer
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100898211
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
30
9
2018
medline:
27
8
2019
entrez:
30
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hereditary predisposition is estimated to account for 10% of all pancreatic cancer cases. However, referral patterns and clinical workflow for germline testing in this disease differ significantly by institution, and many at-risk patients may not undergo appropriate counseling and testing. We undertook an analysis of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PDAC) who were referred to the Clinical Genetics program of a high-volume academic center over a 3-year period to assess referral frequency, evaluate the yield of germline testing in this selected patient cohort, and elucidate the reasons individuals did not undergo recommended germline testing. Medical records of patients with PDAC referred for genetic counseling between January 2015 and October 2017 were reviewed for demographic, medical/family history, and disease-specific data. If testing did not occur, reasons were documented. Genetic test results were categorized as negative, variants of unknown significance, or established pathogenic mutations. Descriptive statistics included means with standard deviations; associations were analyzed with t test and Fisher's exact test. 32% (137 of 432) of PDAC patients were referred for genetic counseling, but only 64% attended their appointment and 60% ultimately underwent germline testing. Common reasons for attrition included worsening disease severity, lack of patient follow-up, insurance concerns, and logistic/travel challenges. Pathogenic germline mutations were detected in 20% (16 of 82) of patients tested, distributed across races/ethnicities, and significantly associated with younger age and positive family history of breast cancer. PDAC patients frequently do not undergo genetic counseling/germline testing despite appropriate referrals, highlighting a need to develop streamlined processes to engage more patients in testing, especially those with high-risk features.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30267352
doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0106-2
pii: 10.1007/s10689-018-0106-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
241-251Références
Clin Ther. 2016 Jul;38(7):1622-35
pubmed: 27041411
Cell Cycle. 2011 Jun 1;10(11):1757-63
pubmed: 21527828
Gastroenterology. 2001 Dec;121(6):1310-9
pubmed: 11729110
Semin Oncol. 2016 Oct;43(5):548-553
pubmed: 27899186
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Mar 15;24(6):1326-1336
pubmed: 29367431
JAMA. 2018 Jun 19;319(23):2401-2409
pubmed: 29922827
Gut. 2005 Oct;54(10):1456-60
pubmed: 15987793
Genet Med. 2011 Apr;13(4):349-55
pubmed: 21358336
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Mar;45(4):618-24
pubmed: 18996005
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3660-7
pubmed: 26324357
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 9;361(2):123-34
pubmed: 19553641
Cancer. 2012 Apr 15;118(8):1989-93
pubmed: 21952991
Pancreas. 2012 Mar;41(2):222-9
pubmed: 22076568
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jan 15;15(2):740-6
pubmed: 19147782
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21(13):4104-8
pubmed: 24756810
Breast J. 2009 Sep-Oct;15 Suppl 1:S56-62
pubmed: 19775331
Genet Med. 2015 Jan;17(1):70-87
pubmed: 25394175
Br J Nurs. 2016 Jun 23;25(12):690-4
pubmed: 27345073
Community Genet. 2003;6(3):147-56
pubmed: 15237199
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Feb 18;96(4):261-8
pubmed: 14970275
Am J Hum Genet. 2004 Jan;74(1):176-9
pubmed: 14685937
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Oct 1;110(10):1067-1074
pubmed: 29506128
Ann Oncol. 1999;10 Suppl 4:69-73
pubmed: 10436789
Clin Genet. 2015 May;87(5):473-7
pubmed: 24735105
Genet Med. 2001 Mar-Apr;3(2):149-54
pubmed: 11280952
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan;152(1):68-74.e2
pubmed: 27856273
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3124-9
pubmed: 25940717
DNA Cell Biol. 2013 Jun;32(6):329-35
pubmed: 23713947
J Genet Couns. 2014 Dec;23(6):1002-11
pubmed: 24794065
Pancreas. 2006 Oct;33(3):221-7
pubmed: 17003641
Ann Oncol. 2014 Jan;25(1):32-40
pubmed: 24225019
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):130-136
pubmed: 28162234
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 13;6:29506
pubmed: 27406733
Gastroenterology. 1999 Jun;116(6):1453-6
pubmed: 10348829
Br J Cancer. 2014 Sep 9;111(6):1132-8
pubmed: 25072261
Int J Cancer. 2011 Nov 1;129(9):2256-62
pubmed: 21171015
Gut. 2001 Jan;48(1):70-4
pubmed: 11115825
Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409-413
pubmed: 28596308
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 20;35(30):3382-3390
pubmed: 28767289
Genet Med. 2015 Jan;17(1):51-7
pubmed: 24922460