Accuracy of biometric formulae in hypermetropic patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Axial Length, Eye
/ pathology
Biometry
/ methods
Female
Humans
Hyperopia
/ physiopathology
Lens Implantation, Intraocular
Lenses, Intraocular
Male
Optics and Photonics
Phacoemulsification
Refraction, Ocular
/ physiology
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Vision Tests
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Biometry
Hoffer Q
cataract surgery
hypermetropic
intraocular lens
Journal
European journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1724-6016
Titre abrégé: Eur J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9110772
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
3
10
2018
medline:
23
11
2019
entrez:
2
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To audit and analyse the accuracy of current biometric formulae on refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients with axial length less than 22 mm. A total of 84 eyes from 84 patients with axial length <22 mm were identified from consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery retrospectively at a single university hospital. All subjects had biometry using the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA, USA) and a Sensar AR40 intraocular lens implant (Abbott Medical Optics, CA, USA). One eye from each patient was randomly selected for inclusion. Prediction errors were calculated by comparing expected refraction from optimized formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis and Holladay 1) to postoperative refraction. A national survey of ophthalmologists was conducted to ascertain biometric formula preference for small eyes. The mean axial length was 21.00 ± 0.55 mm. Mean error was greatest for Hoffer Q at -0.57 dioptres. There was no significant difference in mean absolute error between formulae. SRK/T achieved the highest percentage of outcomes within 0.5 dioptres (45.2%) and 1 dioptre (76.2%) of target. Shallower anterior chamber depth was associated with higher mean absolute error for SRK/T (p = 0.028), Hoffer Q (p = 0.003) and Haigis (p = 0.016) but not Holladay (p = 0.111). SRK/T had the highest proportion of patients achieving refractive results close to predicted outcomes. However, there was a significant association between a shallower anterior chamber depth and higher mean absolute error for all formulae except Holladay 1. This suggests that anterior chamber depth with axial length should be considered when counselling patients about refractive outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30270649
doi: 10.1177/1120672118803509
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
510-515Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn