Radiofrequency-induced Thermo-chemotherapy Effect Versus a Second Course of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin or Institutional Standard in Patients with Recurrence of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Following Induction or Maintenance Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Therapy (HYMN): A Phase III, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Trial.


Journal

European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 10 05 2018
accepted: 04 09 2018
pubmed: 3 10 2018
medline: 7 6 2019
entrez: 3 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is no effective intravesical second-line therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) when bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) fails. To compare disease-free survival time (DFS) between radiofrequency-induced thermo-chemotherapy effect (RITE) and institutional standard second-line therapy (control) in NMIBC patients with recurrence following induction/maintenance BCG. Open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial accrued across 14 centres between May 2010 and July 2013 (HYMN [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01094964]). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to RITE (60min, 40mg mitomycin-C, 42±2°C) or control following stratification for carcinoma in situ (CIS) status (present/absent), therapy history (failure of previous induction/maintenance BCG), and treatment centre. Primary outcome measures were DFS and complete response (CR) at 3 mo for the CIS at randomisation subgroup. Analysis was based on intention-to-treat. A total of 104 patients were randomised (48 RITE: 56 control). Median follow-up for the 31 patients without a DFS event was 36 mo. There was no significant difference in DFS between treatment arms (hazard ratio [HR] 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-2.10, p=0.23) or in 3-mo CR rate in CIS patients (n=71; RITE: 30% vs control: 47%, p=0.15). There was no significant difference in DFS between treatment arms in non-CIS patients (n=33; RITE: 53% vs control: 24% at 24 mo, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22-1.17, p=0.11). DFS was significantly lower in RITE than in control in CIS with/without papillary patients (n=71; HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.17-3.62, p=0.01; treatment-subgroup interaction p=0.007). Disease progression was observed in four patients in each treatment arm. Adverse events and health-related quality of life between treatment arms were comparable. DFS was similar between RITE and control. RITE may be a second-line therapy for non-CIS recurrence following BCG failure; however, confirmatory trials are needed. RITE patients with CIS with/without papillary had lower DFS than control. HYMN highlights the importance of the control arm when evaluating novel therapies. This study did not show a difference in bladder cancer outcomes between microwave-heated chemotherapy and standard of care treatment. Papillary bladder lesions may benefit from microwave-heated chemotherapy treatment; however, more research is needed. Both treatments are similarly well tolerated.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is no effective intravesical second-line therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) when bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) fails.
OBJECTIVE
To compare disease-free survival time (DFS) between radiofrequency-induced thermo-chemotherapy effect (RITE) and institutional standard second-line therapy (control) in NMIBC patients with recurrence following induction/maintenance BCG.
DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS
Open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial accrued across 14 centres between May 2010 and July 2013 (HYMN [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01094964]).
INTERVENTION
Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to RITE (60min, 40mg mitomycin-C, 42±2°C) or control following stratification for carcinoma in situ (CIS) status (present/absent), therapy history (failure of previous induction/maintenance BCG), and treatment centre.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Primary outcome measures were DFS and complete response (CR) at 3 mo for the CIS at randomisation subgroup. Analysis was based on intention-to-treat.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
A total of 104 patients were randomised (48 RITE: 56 control). Median follow-up for the 31 patients without a DFS event was 36 mo. There was no significant difference in DFS between treatment arms (hazard ratio [HR] 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-2.10, p=0.23) or in 3-mo CR rate in CIS patients (n=71; RITE: 30% vs control: 47%, p=0.15). There was no significant difference in DFS between treatment arms in non-CIS patients (n=33; RITE: 53% vs control: 24% at 24 mo, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22-1.17, p=0.11). DFS was significantly lower in RITE than in control in CIS with/without papillary patients (n=71; HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.17-3.62, p=0.01; treatment-subgroup interaction p=0.007). Disease progression was observed in four patients in each treatment arm. Adverse events and health-related quality of life between treatment arms were comparable.
CONCLUSIONS
DFS was similar between RITE and control. RITE may be a second-line therapy for non-CIS recurrence following BCG failure; however, confirmatory trials are needed. RITE patients with CIS with/without papillary had lower DFS than control. HYMN highlights the importance of the control arm when evaluating novel therapies.
PATIENT SUMMARY
This study did not show a difference in bladder cancer outcomes between microwave-heated chemotherapy and standard of care treatment. Papillary bladder lesions may benefit from microwave-heated chemotherapy treatment; however, more research is needed. Both treatments are similarly well tolerated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30274699
pii: S0302-2838(18)30655-9
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.005
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0
BCG Vaccine 0
Mitomycin 50SG953SK6

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01094964']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

63-71

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 10008
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : CRUK/09/012
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Wei Shen Tan (WS)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Anesh Panchal (A)

Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Laura Buckley (L)

Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Adam J Devall (AJ)

Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Laurence S Loubière (LS)

Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Ann M Pope (AM)

Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Mark R Feneley (MR)

Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Jo Cresswell (J)

Department of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.

Rami Issa (R)

Department of Urology, St George's Hospital, London, UK.

Hugh Mostafid (H)

Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.

Sanjeev Madaan (S)

Department of Urology, Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford, UK.

Rupesh Bhatt (R)

Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

John McGrath (J)

Department of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK.

Vijay Sangar (V)

Department of Urology, Withington Hospital, Manchester, UK.

T R Leyshon Griffiths (TRL)

Department of Urology, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.

Toby Page (T)

Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Dominic Hodgson (D)

Department of Urology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.

Shibendra N Datta (SN)

Department of Urology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Lucinda J Billingham (LJ)

Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

John D Kelly (JD)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK. Electronic address: j.d.kelly@ucl.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH