Intraoperative Cell Salvage During Transurethral Resection of Prostate: A Case Report.
Journal
A&A practice
ISSN: 2575-3126
Titre abrégé: A A Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101714112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2019
01 Apr 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
3
10
2018
medline:
29
8
2019
entrez:
3
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) became commercially available in 1968 and has enjoyed wide uptake. However, its use in transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) remains rare. We describe a 71-year-old man who underwent TURP with incomplete blood cross-matching. He suffered significant hemorrhage requiring return to theater. There was great delay in obtaining appropriately cross-matched blood, due to previous alloimmunization. ICS was used to retrieve blood present in bladder irrigation. This is the first Australian report of ICS use during TURP. This case led to a change in our practice and serves to demonstrate the potential of this technology during emergencies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30277899
doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000895
pii: 02054229-201904010-00006
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
238-240Références
Tang Y, Li J, Pu C. Bipolar transurethral resection versus monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2014;28:1107–1114.
Tormey CA, Fisk J, Stack G. Red blood cell alloantibody frequency, specificity, and properties in a population of male military veterans. Transfusion. 2008;48:2069–2076.
Einerson BD, Stehlikova Z, Nelson RE, Bellows BK, Kawamoto K, Clark EAS. Transfusion preparedness strategies for obstetric hemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:1347–1355.
Palmer T, Wahr JA, O’Reilly M, Greenfield ML. Reducing unnecessary cross-matching: a patient-specific blood ordering system is more accurate in predicting who will receive a blood transfusion than the maximum blood ordering system. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:369–375.
Saverimuttu J, Greenfield T, Rotenko I, Crozier J, Jalaludin B, Harvey M. Implications for urgent transfusion of uncrossmatched blood in the emergency department: the prevalence of clinically significant red cell antibodies within different patient groups. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003;15:239–243.
McWilliams B, Yazer MH, Cramer J, Triulzi DJ, Waters JH. Incomplete pretransfusion testing leads to surgical delays. Transfusion. 2012;52:2139–2144.
McKinney ZJ, Peters JM, Gorlin JB, Perry EH. Improving red blood cell orders, utilization, and management with point-of-care clinical decision support. Transfusion. 2015;55:2086–2094.
Davies L, Brown TJ, Haynes S, Payne K, Elliott RA, McCollum C. Cost-effectiveness of cell salvage and alternative methods of minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10:iii–iv, ixx, 1210.
Duncan J. On re-infusion of blood in primary and other amputations. Br Med J. 1886;1:192–193.
Klebanoff G. Early clinical experience with a disposable unit for the intraoperative salvage and reinfusion of blood loss (intraoperative autotransfusion). Am J Surg. 1970;120:718–722.
Wilson JD, Utz DC, Taswell HF. Autotransfusion during transurethral resection of the prostate: technique and preliminary clinical evaluation. Mayo Clin Proc. 1969;44:374–386.
Carless PA, Henry DA, Moxey AJ, O’Connell D, Brown T, Fergusson DA. Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD001888.
Osawa T, Nakamura S, Imai T. Intraoperative blood recovery in transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1992;83:1276–1283.
Staehler G, Jänicke U, Schmiedt E, Stelzer J. Autologous retransfusion of washed erythrocytes in transurethral resection of prostatic adenomas. Preliminary report. Urologe A. 1988;27:218–220.
Kinnear N, O’Callaghan M, Hennessey D, et al. Intra-operative cell salvage in urological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. BJU Int. 2018. doi:10.1111/bju.14373.
doi: 10.1111/bju.14373