The effect of age, gender, and time between blood draw and start of centrifugation on the size outcomes of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes.
Blood platelets
Centrifugation
Fibrin
Platelet-rich fibrin
Wound healing
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
09
07
2018
accepted:
27
09
2018
pubmed:
4
10
2018
medline:
28
12
2019
entrez:
4
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has been utilized in regenerative dentistry as a supra-physiological concentrate of autologous growth factors capable of stimulating tissue regeneration. Due to the variability in the macroscopic morphology/size of PRF membranes observed between patients, we were interested in studying the effects of patient age, gender, and time between blood draw and the start of centrifugation on the size outcomes of PRF membranes. Despite PRF therapy being increasingly more popular in private practice, to date, no study has investigated the effects of the delay between blood draw and the start of centrifugation in a clinical setting. A total of 60 patients enrolled in this study were divided into 6 groups of 10 patients each, including male and female patients categorized into age groups 21-40, 41-60, and 61-80 years. From each patient, a total of five PRF membranes were fabricated from 10-mL tubes following centrifugation starting after 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 s. In total, 300 PRF membranes were produced in this study to investigate the effects of patient age, gender, and time on the size outcomes of PRF membranes. A longer delay by the clinician before starting centrifugation following blood draw led to a smaller final size of PRF membranes. At 90 s following blood draw, a significant (13%) reduction in PRF membrane size was observed. After 120 s, a significant (23%) reduction was observed. Additionally, female patients had on average 17% larger membranes compared to men (p < 0.05, 300 samples). Lastly, the size outcomes of the PRF membranes was largest in patients aged 61-80, followed by those aged 41-60 and 21-40. However, no statistically significant differences in PRF membrane sizes were reported between age groups. The time at which a centrifugation procedure begins following blood draw is critical to optimize the size outcomes of PRF membranes. In general, approximately 15 s is required per tube to harvest 9-10 cc of blood. Therefore, a 60- to 90-s interval between blood draw and the start of centrifugation should be a parameter that is respected by clinicians to avoid significant changes in the macroscopic morphology/size of fabricated PRF membranes. Furthermore, females and older patients produced larger membranes, likely due to lower red blood cell counts derived from their peripheral blood. The findings from the present study demonstrate that on average, a clinician has approximately 60-90 s between blood draw and the start of the centrifugation cycle to produce standard-sized PRF membranes. Shortly thereafter, a significant reduction in size is observed. Additionally, females and older patients were found to produce larger PRF membranes. Centrifugation protocols may therefore be adapted accordingly.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30280327
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2673-x
pii: 10.1007/s00784-018-2673-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2179-2185Références
J Gend Specif Med. 2001;4(1):35-40
pubmed: 11324238
Microgravity Sci Technol. 1995 Aug;8(2):125-30
pubmed: 11541860
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Apr;62(4):489-96
pubmed: 15085519
J Periodontol. 2010 Apr;81(4):546-55
pubmed: 20373539
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2009 Jan;13(1):50-4
pubmed: 20376243
Transfusion. 1990 Sep;30(7):634-8
pubmed: 2144922
J Oral Implantol. 2011 Dec;37(6):681-90
pubmed: 21718187
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Apr;32(2):e41-50
pubmed: 22292152
Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Sep;3(Suppl 2):S240-3
pubmed: 23230372
Int J Dent. 2013;2013:875380
pubmed: 23653648
J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Jul;24(4):1088-94
pubmed: 23851746
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Dec;40(6):679-89
pubmed: 24945603
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 May;18(3):399-402
pubmed: 25024559
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1989 Apr;36(1):1-7
pubmed: 2525784
J Int Oral Health. 2015 Apr;7(4):32-7
pubmed: 25954068
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Jun;14(2):410-6
pubmed: 26028867
J Periodontol. 2016 Feb;87(2):103-13
pubmed: 26313017
Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar;32(3):495-505
pubmed: 26432430
J Periodontal Res. 2016 Aug;51(4):481-8
pubmed: 26447636
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Dec;24(12):1852-9
pubmed: 26456434
J Med Case Rep. 2015 Nov 02;9:252
pubmed: 26527036
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Dec;20(9):2353-2360
pubmed: 26809431
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 Mar-Apr;20(2):151-6
pubmed: 27143826
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016 Aug;17(4):359-67
pubmed: 27234711
J Periodontol. 2017 Jan;88(1):112-121
pubmed: 27587367
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2017 Feb;23(1):83-99
pubmed: 27672729
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Nov;21(8):2619-2627
pubmed: 28154995
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jul;21(6):1913-1927
pubmed: 28551729
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017 Oct 25;28(12):188
pubmed: 29071440
Platelets. 2019;30(3):329-340
pubmed: 29509050
Thromb Haemost. 1982 Dec 27;48(3):260-2
pubmed: 6819645
Thromb Res. 1983 Jan 15;29(2):243-8
pubmed: 6845279
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jun;85(6):638-46
pubmed: 9638695