Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Agoraphobia
/ therapy
Anxiety
/ psychology
Anxiety Disorders
/ psychology
Humans
Implosive Therapy
Panic Disorder
/ therapy
Phobia, Social
/ therapy
Phobic Disorders
/ therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Sample Size
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
/ therapy
Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
Meta-Analysis
VR
VRET
Virtual reality
Virtual reality exposure therapy
Journal
Journal of anxiety disorders
ISSN: 1873-7897
Titre abrégé: J Anxiety Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8710131
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
15
06
2018
revised:
06
07
2018
accepted:
07
08
2018
pubmed:
6
10
2018
medline:
11
2
2020
entrez:
6
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Trials of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for anxiety-related disorders have proliferated in number and diversity since our previous meta-analysis that examined 13 total trials, most of which were for specific phobias (Powers & Emmelkamp, 2008). Since then, new trials have compared VRET to more diverse anxiety and related disorders including social anxiety disorder (SAD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and panic disorder (PD) with and without agoraphobia. With the availability of this data, it is imperative to re-examine the efficacy of VRET for anxiety. A literature search for randomized controlled trials of VRET versus control or in vivo exposure yielded 30 studies with 1057 participants. Fourteen studies tested VRET for specific phobias, 8 for SAD or performance anxiety, 5 for PTSD, and 3 for PD. A random effects analysis estimated a large effect size for VRET versus waitlist (g = 0.90) and a medium to large effect size for VRET versus psychological placebo conditions (g = 0.78). A comparison of VRET and in vivo conditions did not show significantly different effect sizes (g = -0.07). These findings were relatively consistent across disorders. A meta-regression analysis revealed that larger sample sizes were associated with lower effect sizes in VRET versus control comparisons (β = -0.007, p < 0.05). These results indicate that VRET is an effective and equal medium for exposure therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30287083
pii: S0887-6185(18)30246-9
doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
27-36Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.