Developing Telemental Health Partnerships Between State Medical Schools and Federally Qualified Health Centers: Navigating the Regulatory Landscape and Policy Recommendations.
access
mental health
policy
safety net clinics
telehealth
Journal
The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association
ISSN: 1748-0361
Titre abrégé: J Rural Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508122
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
6
10
2018
medline:
9
6
2020
entrez:
6
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) deliver care to 26 million Americans living in underserved areas, but few offer telemental health (TMH) services. The social missions of FQHCs and publicly funded state medical schools create a compelling argument for the development of TMH partnerships. In this paper, we share our experience and recommendations from launching TMH partnerships between 12 rural FQHCs and 3 state medical schools. There was consensus that medical school TMH providers should practice as part of the FQHC team to promote integration, enhance quality and safety, and ensure financial sustainability. For TMH providers to practice and bill as FQHC providers, the following issues must be addressed: (1) credentialing and privileging the TMH providers at the FQHC, (2) expanding FQHC Scope of Project to include telepsychiatry, (3) remote access to medical records, (4) insurance credentialing/paneling, billing, and supplemental payments, (5) contracting with the medical school, and (6) indemnity coverage for TMH. We make recommendations to both state medical schools and FQHCs about how to overcome existing barriers to TMH partnerships. We also make recommendations about changes to policy that would mitigate the impact of these barriers. Specifically, we make recommendations to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid about insurance credentialing, facility fees, eligibility of TMH encounters for supplemental payments, and Medicare eligibility rules for TMH billing by FQHCs. We also make recommendations to the Health Resources and Services Administration about restrictions on adding telepsychiatry to the FQHCs' Scope of Project and the eligibility of TMH providers for indemnity coverage under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) deliver care to 26 million Americans living in underserved areas, but few offer telemental health (TMH) services. The social missions of FQHCs and publicly funded state medical schools create a compelling argument for the development of TMH partnerships. In this paper, we share our experience and recommendations from launching TMH partnerships between 12 rural FQHCs and 3 state medical schools.
EXPERIENCE
There was consensus that medical school TMH providers should practice as part of the FQHC team to promote integration, enhance quality and safety, and ensure financial sustainability. For TMH providers to practice and bill as FQHC providers, the following issues must be addressed: (1) credentialing and privileging the TMH providers at the FQHC, (2) expanding FQHC Scope of Project to include telepsychiatry, (3) remote access to medical records, (4) insurance credentialing/paneling, billing, and supplemental payments, (5) contracting with the medical school, and (6) indemnity coverage for TMH.
RECOMMENDATIONS
We make recommendations to both state medical schools and FQHCs about how to overcome existing barriers to TMH partnerships. We also make recommendations about changes to policy that would mitigate the impact of these barriers. Specifically, we make recommendations to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid about insurance credentialing, facility fees, eligibility of TMH encounters for supplemental payments, and Medicare eligibility rules for TMH billing by FQHCs. We also make recommendations to the Health Resources and Services Administration about restrictions on adding telepsychiatry to the FQHCs' Scope of Project and the eligibility of TMH providers for indemnity coverage under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30288797
doi: 10.1111/jrh.12323
pmc: PMC7379613
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
287-297Informations de copyright
© 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Rural Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of National Rural Health Association.
Références
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul;43(3):366-79
pubmed: 26695645
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jun;19(6):433-7
pubmed: 23590176
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;72(1):58-67
pubmed: 25409287
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Nov;63(11):1131-3
pubmed: 23117510
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Feb 1;68(2):173-178
pubmed: 27691381
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 15;152(12):804-11
pubmed: 20547907
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 May-Jun;29(3):199-206
pubmed: 17484936
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):909-917
pubmed: 28461359
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(6):569-92
pubmed: 26540642
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(6):525-39
pubmed: 26634618
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Oct;60(10):1323-8
pubmed: 19797371
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Apr;26(3):198-203
pubmed: 26259027
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Dec 1;68(12):1303-1306
pubmed: 28859581
Online J Public Health Inform. 2014 Oct 16;6(2):e185
pubmed: 25422721
Psychosomatics. 2018 May - Jun;59(3):227-250
pubmed: 29544663
Acad Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;35(4):252-255
pubmed: 21804046
Acad Med. 2007 Feb;82(2):133-8
pubmed: 17264689
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Jul;21(7):564-6
pubmed: 25799233
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;170(4):414-25
pubmed: 23429924
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):629-40
pubmed: 15939840
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Sep;19(9):722-30
pubmed: 23909884
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2015 Sep;38(3):559-92
pubmed: 26300039