Risk of Systemic Adverse Events Associated with Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema in Routine Clinical Practice.


Journal

Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1549-4713
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802443

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
received: 06 01 2018
revised: 24 09 2018
accepted: 25 09 2018
pubmed: 8 10 2018
medline: 3 3 2020
entrez: 8 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pharmacotherapy has become standard of care for the management of diabetic macular edema (DME). The systemic safety profile of this treatment in routine clinical practice remains incompletely understood. We used a large claims database to investigate the risk of systemic serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients receiving anti-VEGF for DME compared with controls treated with macular laser photocoagulation or intravitreal corticosteroid. Retrospective cohort study. By using a large U.S. insurance database, we identified privately insured and Medicare Advantage patients aged ≥18 years treated with anti-VEGF for DME between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2015, along with control patients receiving macular laser or corticosteroid. We included patients with 1 year of medical coverage before initial DME treatment. We assessed associations between treatment modalities and predefined systemic outcomes using Cox proportional hazards regression. We performed 2 separate comparisons, one between anti-VEGF and macular laser and one between anti-VEGF and corticosteroid. We used inverse propensity score weighting for the first comparison to account for treatment selection bias. For the second, we used 2:1 propensity score matching on demographics, year, and baseline comorbidities because of the smaller number of corticosteroid-treated patients. Risk of cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, and all-cause hospitalization occurring within 6 months of initial DME treatment as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 23 348 patients receiving treatment for DME met inclusion criteria; 13 365 received macular laser, 9219 received intravitreal anti-VEGF, and 764 received intravitreal corticosteroid as initial treatment. Anti-VEGF pharmacotherapy was not associated with an increased hazard of cerebrovascular disease (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.65-1.41; P = 0.83), major bleeding (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.76-1.99; P = 0.41), or myocardial infarction (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.73-1.44; P = 0.88) when compared with macular laser for DME; however, there was an increased hazard of post-treatment all-cause hospital admission (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.30; P = 0.01). The rates of all primary systemic SAE outcomes were similar after treatment with anti-VEGF versus corticosteroid (P > 0.05 for all). We identified no increased risk of cerebrovascular disease, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding within 6 months after intravitreal anti-VEGF pharmacotherapy for the treatment of DME in routine clinical practice. A potential difference in all-cause hospitalization may merit further investigation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30292542
pii: S0161-6420(18)30063-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.040
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Angiogenesis Inhibitors 0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A 0
Bevacizumab 2S9ZZM9Q9V
Ranibizumab ZL1R02VT79

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1007-1015

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Maya H Maloney (MH)

Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Stephanie R Schilz (SR)

Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Jeph Herrin (J)

Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

Lindsey R Sangaralingham (LR)

Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Nilay D Shah (ND)

Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Andrew J Barkmeier (AJ)

Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: barkmeier.andrew@mayo.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH