[Erratum to: Effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy : Influence of clinical response from the patient's point of view].
Erratum zu: Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit der Elektrokonvulsionstherapie : Einfluss des klinischen Ansprechens aus Patientensicht.
Journal
Der Nervenarzt
ISSN: 1433-0407
Titre abrégé: Nervenarzt
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0400773
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
12
10
2018
medline:
12
10
2018
entrez:
11
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective, yet still controversial therapy for both the general public and psychiatrists. In this study, we investigated the patients' view regarding effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy under consideration of individual clinical response. In 31 patients with major depression, subjective effectiveness and tolerability were assessed via a differentiated questionnaire prior to, during, and after ECT. Symptoms were rated using the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS) and the Beck depression inventory II (BDI‑II) RESULTS: Patients assessed ECT to be generally effective both before and after the treatment. This view was independent of their individual treatment success. In contrast, patients' rating of individual effectiveness depended on the objective improvement of their symptoms. Side effects were rated to be generally slight to moderate. Against the background of persisting criticism towards ECT, the viewpoint of involved patients provides us with important references for an appropriate judgement of this therapy. The results suggest a good benefit-risk ratio for ECT from the patients' perspective.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective, yet still controversial therapy for both the general public and psychiatrists. In this study, we investigated the patients' view regarding effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy under consideration of individual clinical response.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
In 31 patients with major depression, subjective effectiveness and tolerability were assessed via a differentiated questionnaire prior to, during, and after ECT. Symptoms were rated using the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS) and the Beck depression inventory II (BDI‑II) RESULTS: Patients assessed ECT to be generally effective both before and after the treatment. This view was independent of their individual treatment success. In contrast, patients' rating of individual effectiveness depended on the objective improvement of their symptoms. Side effects were rated to be generally slight to moderate.
CONCLUSION
Against the background of persisting criticism towards ECT, the viewpoint of involved patients provides us with important references for an appropriate judgement of this therapy. The results suggest a good benefit-risk ratio for ECT from the patients' perspective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30302515
doi: 10.1007/s00115-018-0631-0
pii: 10.1007/s00115-018-0631-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Published Erratum
Langues
ger
Pagination
71-72Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumFor