Attitudinal and behavioural responses to increasing tobacco control regulation among high smoking prevalence groups: A qualitative study.


Journal

Drug and alcohol review
ISSN: 1465-3362
Titre abrégé: Drug Alcohol Rev
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9015440

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 15 04 2018
revised: 01 07 2018
accepted: 19 09 2018
pubmed: 12 10 2018
medline: 30 5 2019
entrez: 11 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite substantial reductions in smoking prevalence in many countries, rates remain high among people who are experiencing disadvantage. This study aimed to explore attitudinal and behavioural responses to population-wide tobacco control policies among Australian smokers experiencing disadvantage. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 84 smokers attending community service organisations in the mental health, homelessness, and alcohol and other drug sectors. Interviewees discussed various tobacco control policies (tobacco taxes, smoke-free areas, plain packaging and graphic health warnings). The interview transcriptions were coded and thematically analysed. Responses to tobacco taxes were mixed. Some interviewees reported smoking less as a result of price increases, while others reallocated funds from other budget areas. Many perceived smoke-free area policies as effective, although some described strategies they use to circumvent this policy, thereby diminishing its effectiveness. Plain packaging and graphic warnings were perceived as being least effective. While tobacco control policies can elicit intended attitudinal and behavioural responses, additional efforts are needed to enhance their effectiveness among smokers experiencing disadvantage. Future efforts to reduce smoking rates should address responses that diminish policy effectiveness among groups exhibiting high smoking prevalence. This could be achieved through strategies that address the specific needs of these groups, such as providing additional cessation support, enforcing existing smoke-free policies in ways that minimise inequitable effects, and addressing self-exempting beliefs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30302848
doi: 10.1111/dar.12869
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

92-100

Informations de copyright

© 2018 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.

Auteurs

Ashleigh Parnell (A)

School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

Emily Box (E)

Cancer Council WA, Perth, Australia.

Nicole Biagioni (N)

School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

Billie Bonevski (B)

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Juli Coffin (J)

Broome Campus, University of Notre Dame, Broome, Australia.

Terry Slevin (T)

School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Cancer Council WA, Perth, Australia.

Julia Anwar-McHenry (J)

School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

Simone Pettigrew (S)

School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH