Attitudinal and behavioural responses to increasing tobacco control regulation among high smoking prevalence groups: A qualitative study.
Adolescent
Adult
Attitude to Health
Commerce
Female
Health Policy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Qualitative Research
Smoke-Free Policy
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Smokers
/ psychology
Smoking
/ psychology
Smoking Cessation
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Smoking Prevention
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Tobacco Products
/ legislation & jurisprudence
Young Adult
disadvantage
policies
tobacco control
tobacco use
Journal
Drug and alcohol review
ISSN: 1465-3362
Titre abrégé: Drug Alcohol Rev
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9015440
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
15
04
2018
revised:
01
07
2018
accepted:
19
09
2018
pubmed:
12
10
2018
medline:
30
5
2019
entrez:
11
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite substantial reductions in smoking prevalence in many countries, rates remain high among people who are experiencing disadvantage. This study aimed to explore attitudinal and behavioural responses to population-wide tobacco control policies among Australian smokers experiencing disadvantage. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 84 smokers attending community service organisations in the mental health, homelessness, and alcohol and other drug sectors. Interviewees discussed various tobacco control policies (tobacco taxes, smoke-free areas, plain packaging and graphic health warnings). The interview transcriptions were coded and thematically analysed. Responses to tobacco taxes were mixed. Some interviewees reported smoking less as a result of price increases, while others reallocated funds from other budget areas. Many perceived smoke-free area policies as effective, although some described strategies they use to circumvent this policy, thereby diminishing its effectiveness. Plain packaging and graphic warnings were perceived as being least effective. While tobacco control policies can elicit intended attitudinal and behavioural responses, additional efforts are needed to enhance their effectiveness among smokers experiencing disadvantage. Future efforts to reduce smoking rates should address responses that diminish policy effectiveness among groups exhibiting high smoking prevalence. This could be achieved through strategies that address the specific needs of these groups, such as providing additional cessation support, enforcing existing smoke-free policies in ways that minimise inequitable effects, and addressing self-exempting beliefs.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
92-100Informations de copyright
© 2018 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.