Behavior Change Techniques and Their Mechanisms of Action: A Synthesis of Links Described in Published Intervention Literature.

Behavior change Behavior change technique Evidence synthesis Mechanism of action Methodology Theory

Journal

Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine
ISSN: 1532-4796
Titre abrégé: Ann Behav Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8510246

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 07 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 12 10 2018
medline: 29 9 2020
entrez: 11 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite advances in behavioral science, there is no widely shared understanding of the "mechanisms of action" (MoAs) through which individual behavior change techniques (BCTs) have their effects. Cumulative progress in the development, evaluation, and synthesis of behavioral interventions could be improved by identifying the MoAs through which BCTs are believed to bring about change. This study aimed to identify the links between BCTs and MoAs described by authors of a corpus of published literature. Hypothesized links between BCTs and MoAs were extracted by two coders from 277 behavior change intervention articles. Binomial tests were conducted to provide an indication of the relative frequency of each link. Of 77 BCTs coded, 70 were linked to at least one MoA. Of 26 MoAs, all but one were linked to at least one BCT. We identified 2,636 BCT-MoA links in total (mean number of links per article = 9.56, SD = 13.80). The most frequently linked MoAs were "Beliefs about Capabilities" and "Intention." Binomial test results identified up to five MoAs linked to each of the BCTs (M = 1.71, range: 1-5) and up to eight BCTs for each of the MoAs (M = 3.63, range: 1-8). The BCT-MoA links described by intervention authors and identified in this extensive review present intervention developers and reviewers with a first level of systematically collated evidence. These findings provide a resource for the development of theory-based interventions, and for theoretical understanding of intervention evaluations. The extent to which these links are empirically supported requires systematic investigation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Despite advances in behavioral science, there is no widely shared understanding of the "mechanisms of action" (MoAs) through which individual behavior change techniques (BCTs) have their effects. Cumulative progress in the development, evaluation, and synthesis of behavioral interventions could be improved by identifying the MoAs through which BCTs are believed to bring about change.
PURPOSE
This study aimed to identify the links between BCTs and MoAs described by authors of a corpus of published literature.
METHODS
Hypothesized links between BCTs and MoAs were extracted by two coders from 277 behavior change intervention articles. Binomial tests were conducted to provide an indication of the relative frequency of each link.
RESULTS
Of 77 BCTs coded, 70 were linked to at least one MoA. Of 26 MoAs, all but one were linked to at least one BCT. We identified 2,636 BCT-MoA links in total (mean number of links per article = 9.56, SD = 13.80). The most frequently linked MoAs were "Beliefs about Capabilities" and "Intention." Binomial test results identified up to five MoAs linked to each of the BCTs (M = 1.71, range: 1-5) and up to eight BCTs for each of the MoAs (M = 3.63, range: 1-8).
CONCLUSIONS
The BCT-MoA links described by intervention authors and identified in this extensive review present intervention developers and reviewers with a first level of systematically collated evidence. These findings provide a resource for the development of theory-based interventions, and for theoretical understanding of intervention evaluations. The extent to which these links are empirically supported requires systematic investigation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30304386
pii: 5126198
doi: 10.1093/abm/kay078
pmc: PMC6636886
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

693-707

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K023195/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L011115/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL076134
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

Références

Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):26-33
pubmed: 15692000
Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87
pubmed: 18624603
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-8
pubmed: 20063930
Addict Behav. 2011 Apr;36(4):315-9
pubmed: 21215528
Psychol Health. 2011 Nov;26(11):1479-98
pubmed: 21678185
Addiction. 2012 Aug;107(8):1431-40
pubmed: 22340523
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:38
pubmed: 22531013
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Health Psychol. 2013 May;32(5):602-8
pubmed: 23646845
Health Psychol. 2014 May;33(5):465-74
pubmed: 23730717
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):296-304
pubmed: 24388292
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 11;14:28
pubmed: 24410738
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Lancet. 2014 Aug 2;384(9941):427-37
pubmed: 24797573
Lancet. 2014 Jul 5;384(9937):45-52
pubmed: 24996589
Alcohol Alcohol. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):540-8
pubmed: 25063992
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 12;16(9):e186
pubmed: 25217464
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Nov 28;11:133
pubmed: 25429846
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 28;4(11):e006046
pubmed: 25432903
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(2):176-89
pubmed: 25739803
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(1):1-14
pubmed: 25793484
Clin Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan 1;2(1):22-34
pubmed: 25821658
Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):89-112
pubmed: 26315814
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 24;10:132
pubmed: 26404642
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 08;18(1):e6
pubmed: 26747176
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;10(3):277-96
pubmed: 26854092
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Apr;44(2):227-235
pubmed: 27226432
Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 18;52(6):501-512
pubmed: 27401001
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Sep;6(3):418-27
pubmed: 27528531
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:573-600
pubmed: 27618942
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec;3:132-135
pubmed: 29302610
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Jul 17;53(8):708-720
pubmed: 30452535
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 May;46(5):423-9
pubmed: 8501467

Auteurs

Rachel N Carey (RN)

Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.

Lauren E Connell (LE)

Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Rhode Island, 25 W Independence Way, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.

Marie Johnston (M)

Aberdeen Health Psychology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Alexander J Rothman (AJ)

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Marijn de Bruin (M)

Aberdeen Health Psychology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Michael P Kelly (MP)

Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Susan Michie (S)

Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH