EVOLUTION AND PATTERNS OF CHOROIDAL THICKNESS CHANGES IN RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT.
Journal
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 1539-2864
Titre abrégé: Retina
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
12
10
2018
medline:
7
2
2021
entrez:
12
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the changes in choroidal thickness (CT) before and after a successful pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD), and to compare the evolution of CT with respect to the extent of RD. Fifty-four patients were divided into three groups: peripheral macula-on RD (>3 mm from the fovea; 14 eyes); paracentral macula-on RD (fovea-sparing; ≤3 mm from the fovea; 14 eyes); and macula-off RD (involving the fovea; 26 eyes). Choroidal thickness was measured at 1 month (M1) and 3 months (M3) postoperatively, preoperatively in macula-on RDs, with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography, from the nasal side (+2.5 mm) to the temporal side (-2.5 mm) of the fovea. In peripheral macula-on RD, the intereye difference in CTs showed thickening throughout follow-up (subfoveally: preoperatively = 19.6% ± 43.9%, M1 = 22.9% ± 27.5%, M3 = 18.2% ± 35.6%). In paracentral macula-on RD, the intereye difference in CTs showed a thinning throughout follow-up (subfoveally: preoperatively = -7.8% ± 21.9%, M1 =-5.5% ± 26.1%, M3 = -9.3% ± 19.4%), as well as in the macula-off RD (subfoveally: M1 = -14.1% ± 18.7%, M3 = -9.9% ± 15%). The extent of RD was related to the evolution of the CT before and after surgery. Further studies are necessary to clarify the relationship between the changes in CT and the effects of circulatory alterations, vitrectomy, and RD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30308562
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002345
pmc: PMC6924946
pii: 00006982-202001000-00006
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
47-55Références
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:586894
pubmed: 23841077
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010 Mar;29(2):144-68
pubmed: 20044062
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Apr 08;52(5):2267-71
pubmed: 21087970
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 20;55(6):3532-42
pubmed: 24845638
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;146(4):496-500
pubmed: 18639219
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2014 Oct;231(10):1029-33
pubmed: 24901425
Retina. 2009 Nov-Dec;29(10):1469-73
pubmed: 19898183
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012 Sep;31(5):377-406
pubmed: 22580107
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;147(5):811-5
pubmed: 19232559
Surv Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep-Oct;58(5):387-429
pubmed: 23916620
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jul;119(7):1497-8
pubmed: 22749090
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;154(5):893-900
pubmed: 22939214
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 25;52(8):5536-40
pubmed: 21508114
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jan;50(1):5-12
pubmed: 18719079
Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Sep;132(3):343-7
pubmed: 11530046
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;249(8):1123-8
pubmed: 21274555
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jan 25;53(1):261-6
pubmed: 22167095
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;169:104-112
pubmed: 27345731
Retina. 2016 Dec;36(12):2371-2376
pubmed: 27579730
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 11;52(8):5121-9
pubmed: 21571673
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Feb 23;53(2):975-85
pubmed: 22232433