Cryobiopsy in the Upper Urinary Tract: Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Device.
Journal
Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
02
07
2018
revised:
21
09
2018
accepted:
02
10
2018
pubmed:
13
10
2018
medline:
16
5
2019
entrez:
13
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To develop a novel device for cryobiopsy of the upper urinary tract (UUT) and to evaluate its feasibility in a standardized preclinical setting. Flexible cryoprobes (diameter 0.9 mm; cooling agent CO2) were developed and used to extract biopsies in porcine UUTs. Cryosamples obtained by ureterorenoscopy were systematically compared with biopsy specimens obtained with standard of care devices in terms of physical characteristics (deflection angle and irrigation flow rates) and histologic criteria (assessability). Irrigation flow rates were significantly higher with introduced BIGopsy (2.8 ± 0.1) compared with standard forceps (0.94 ± 0.06; P < .001) and cryoprobe (1.1 ± 0.1; P < .001). Angular deflection was significantly reduced by the inserted cryoprobe (130.7° ± 1.2° vs 166.9° ± 1.1° [BIGopsy] or 161.4° ± 1.9° [standard forceps]; both P < .001). Significantly larger UUT tissue samples were obtained by the cryoprobe (mean specimen area 7.5 ± 2.5 vs 4.6 ± 2.5 mm² [BIGopsy] or 1.4 ± 1.4 mm² [standard forceps]; both P < .001). No crush artifacts were observed in cryosamples. Superior histologic assessability scores were achieved in samples obtained by the cryoprobe (mean 2.8 ± 0.8) and BIGopsy (2.3 ± 1.9) when compared with standard forceps (0.4 ± 0.9; P < .001). Cryobiopsy in the UUT is feasible and represents a viable new option to improve the diagnostic accuracy of histopathologic evaluation. Larger and more representative tissue samples can be obtained using a cryoprobe and artifacts may be avoided. Further optimization of the probe will reduce possible restrictions of ureterorenoscopy handling when the device is inserted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30312669
pii: S0090-4295(18)31085-9
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
273-279Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.