Cryobiopsy in the Upper Urinary Tract: Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Device.


Journal

Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 02 07 2018
revised: 21 09 2018
accepted: 02 10 2018
pubmed: 13 10 2018
medline: 16 5 2019
entrez: 13 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To develop a novel device for cryobiopsy of the upper urinary tract (UUT) and to evaluate its feasibility in a standardized preclinical setting. Flexible cryoprobes (diameter 0.9 mm; cooling agent CO2) were developed and used to extract biopsies in porcine UUTs. Cryosamples obtained by ureterorenoscopy were systematically compared with biopsy specimens obtained with standard of care devices in terms of physical characteristics (deflection angle and irrigation flow rates) and histologic criteria (assessability). Irrigation flow rates were significantly higher with introduced BIGopsy (2.8 ± 0.1) compared with standard forceps (0.94 ± 0.06; P < .001) and cryoprobe (1.1 ± 0.1; P < .001). Angular deflection was significantly reduced by the inserted cryoprobe (130.7° ± 1.2° vs 166.9° ± 1.1° [BIGopsy] or 161.4° ± 1.9° [standard forceps]; both P < .001). Significantly larger UUT tissue samples were obtained by the cryoprobe (mean specimen area 7.5 ± 2.5 vs 4.6 ± 2.5 mm² [BIGopsy] or 1.4 ± 1.4 mm² [standard forceps]; both P < .001). No crush artifacts were observed in cryosamples. Superior histologic assessability scores were achieved in samples obtained by the cryoprobe (mean 2.8 ± 0.8) and BIGopsy (2.3 ± 1.9) when compared with standard forceps (0.4 ± 0.9; P < .001). Cryobiopsy in the UUT is feasible and represents a viable new option to improve the diagnostic accuracy of histopathologic evaluation. Larger and more representative tissue samples can be obtained using a cryoprobe and artifacts may be avoided. Further optimization of the probe will reduce possible restrictions of ureterorenoscopy handling when the device is inserted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30312669
pii: S0090-4295(18)31085-9
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Evaluation Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

273-279

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Jan-Thorsten Klein (JT)

Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Franziska Berger (F)

Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Walter Linzenbold (W)

Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany.

Luise Jäger (L)

Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany.

Markus D Enderle (MD)

Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany.

Hans Bösmüller (H)

Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Jens Mundhenk (J)

Department of Urology, Diakonie Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.

Christian Schwentner (C)

Department of Urology, Diakonie Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.

Christian Bolenz (C)

Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. Electronic address: christian.bolenz@uniklinik-ulm.de.

Articles similaires

Humans Students, Medical Robotic Surgical Procedures Feasibility Studies Female
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH