Comparison of exosomes purified via ultracentrifugation (UC) and Total Exosome Isolation (TEI) reagent from the serum of Marek's disease virus (MDV)-vaccinated and tumor-bearing chickens.


Journal

Journal of virological methods
ISSN: 1879-0984
Titre abrégé: J Virol Methods
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8005839

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 21 08 2018
revised: 09 10 2018
accepted: 10 10 2018
pubmed: 15 10 2018
medline: 17 4 2019
entrez: 15 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) is a collective term used to refer microparticles, exosomes, and apoptotic bodies produced by a variety of cells and released into interstitial spaces and bodily fluids. Serum exosomes can serve as invaluable biomarkers, containing m/miRNAs, lipids, and proteins, indicative of various conditions. There are currently limited studies on the characterization and mutual consensus of biomarker profiles of serum exosomes purified by different methods. Here we compared the advantages and disadvantages of two commonly used serum exosome purification procedures including ultracentrifugation (UC) and Total Exosome Isolation (TEI) reagent, by analyzing exosome size distribution, concentration, morphology and miRNA expression profiles. Serum was obtained from Marek's disease virus (MDV)-infected chickens that were either vaccinated against Marek's disease (MD), and thus protected, or unvaccinated and bearing MDV-induced tumors. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) were performed to evaluate particle size, concentration, and morphological integrity, respectively. Our results indicate that the size distribution of particles purified by either procedure is consistent with that of exosomes (30-150 nm). TEI reagent generated higher yields and co-isolated additional EV populations that are slightly larger (∼180 nm). Based on the miRNA expression profiles from a previous high throughput sequencing experiment of exosome small RNAs, we selected six cellular and four MDV1 miRNAs, to validate their expression in UC- and TEI-purified exosomes. miRNA expression profiles displayed relative correlation between the two procedures, but distinctive differences were observed in abundance with TEI-purified exosomes showing higher miRNA expression consistent with higher yield than those purified by UC. TEI-purified exosomes from vaccinated chickens exhibited greater expression of tumor suppressor miRNA, gga-mir-146b and least expression of oncomiR, gga-mir-21 compared to those obtained from tumor-bearing chickens. We propose that gga-mir-146 and -21 can serve as serum exosome biomarkers for vaccine-induced protection and MD tumors respectively.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30316797
pii: S0166-0934(18)30423-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.10.004
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0
Circulating MicroRNA 0
Marek Disease Vaccines 0
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-9

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Sabari Nath Neerukonda (S)

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States. Electronic address: nnvsnath@udel.edu.

Nicholas A Egan (NA)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States. Electronic address: naegan@udel.edu.

Joseph Patria (J)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States. Electronic address: jpatria@udel.edu.

Imane Assakhi (I)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States. Electronic address: Imane@udel.edu.

Phaedra Tavlarides-Hontz (P)

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States. Electronic address: phontz@udel.edu.

Shannon Modla (S)

Delaware Biotechnology Institute, Bioimaging Center, Newark, DE, 19711, United States. Electronic address: Smodla@udel.edu.

Eric R Muñoz (ER)

Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States. Electronic address: Emunoz@udel.edu.

Matthew B Hudson (MB)

Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States. Electronic address: MBHudson@udel.edu.

Mark S Parcells (MS)

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, United States. Electronic address: Parcells@UDel.edu.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
C-Reactive Protein Humans Biomarkers Inflammation
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH