Misdiagnosis of Thoracolumbar Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injuries and Use of Radiographic Parameter Correlations to Improve Detection Accuracy.
Posterior ligamentous complex injury
Radiographic assessment
Spine injury classification
Throacolumbar spinal fracture
Journal
Asian spine journal
ISSN: 1976-1902
Titre abrégé: Asian Spine J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101314177
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
26
12
2017
accepted:
20
07
2018
pubmed:
18
10
2018
medline:
18
10
2018
entrez:
18
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Retrospective study. To evaluate radiological parameters as indicators for posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injuries in the case of limited availability of magnetic resonance imaging. Traumatic thoracolumbar spinal fractures with PLC injuries can be misdiagnosed on X-rays or computed tomography scans. This study aimed to retrospectively assess unrecognized PLC injuries and evaluate radiographic parameters as indicators of PLC injuries requiring surgery. In total, 314 patients with type A and type B2 fractures who underwent surgical treatment between 2001 and 2010 were included. The frequency of misdiagnosis was reassessed, and radiographic parameters were evaluated and correlated. The average age of the patients was 51.8 years. There were 225 type A3/A4 and 89 type B2 fractures; 39 of the type B2 fractures (43.8%) had been misdiagnosed as type A fractures. Type B fractures presented with a significantly higher kyphotic wedge angle and Cobb angle and a lower sagittal index (SI) than type A fractures. In addition, the normalized interspinous distance was higher in type B2 fractures. The significant mathematical indicators for PLC injuries were as follows: Cobb angle+kyphotic wedge angle >29°; Cobb angle2 >170°; and vertebral angle/SI >25. The results demonstrated that PLC injuries are frequently misdiagnosed. Correlations between certain radiological parameters associated with PLC injuries can be useful indicators of the presence of such injuries requiring surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30326695
pii: asj.2017.0333
doi: 10.31616/asj.2017.0333
pmc: PMC6365780
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
29-34Références
Eur Spine J. 2002 Jun;11(3):246-50
pubmed: 12107793
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Oct 1;27(19):2154-8
pubmed: 12394931
Rofo. 2003 Nov;175(11):1500-7
pubmed: 14610701
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 15;30(20):2325-33
pubmed: 16227897
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 1;31(5):E156-65
pubmed: 16508540
Spine J. 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):524-8
pubmed: 16934721
Unfallchirurg. 2008 Dec;111(12):977-84
pubmed: 19037620
Unfallchirurg. 2009 Jan;112(1):33-42, 44-5
pubmed: 19099280
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Apr;12(4):391-6
pubmed: 20367374
Unfallchirurg. 2011 Jan;114(1):9-16
pubmed: 21246343
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 1;37(13):1142-50
pubmed: 22146278
Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22(3):461-74
pubmed: 23208081
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):2028-37
pubmed: 23970107
Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24(4):864-70
pubmed: 25281332
Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):392-8
pubmed: 25457338
Global Spine J. 2015 Oct;5(5):378-82
pubmed: 26430591
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Dec;52(8):1534-51
pubmed: 5483077
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Jan;63(1):62-70
pubmed: 7451527
Eur Spine J. 1994;3(4):184-201
pubmed: 7866834