Keeping mum in clinical supervision: private thoughts and public judgements.


Journal

Medical education
ISSN: 1365-2923
Titre abrégé: Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7605655

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 09 04 2018
revised: 30 05 2018
accepted: 31 07 2018
pubmed: 18 10 2018
medline: 29 5 2019
entrez: 18 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The seemingly obvious claim that people prefer to keep mum about undesirable messages - termed 'the MUM effect' - was initially reported in the psychology literature in the 1970s. More recently, it has been discussed in contexts including performance appraisals and the reporting of unsuccessful projects in workplace settings, but only sparsely in educational ones. We wished to review the published literature on the MUM effect in order to understand the implications for clinical assessment. We performed a narrative literature review on the MUM effect and clustered findings together into three themes: those that describe what MUM behaviours look like, those that explore potential reasons for the MUM effect and those that consider factors that can influence MUM behaviours. This paper summarises the extensive literature on the MUM effect, including its manifestations and modifiers and discusses how the effect may be used to consider issues faced by many clinical supervisors faced with delivering 'negative' assessment messages to trainees. We suggest, that as a pervasive phenomenon, the MUM effect can both help to explain the difficulties that some assessors face when delivering undesirable messages (including feedback or ratings) and offer new insights in how to deal with such issues.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30328138
doi: 10.1111/medu.13728
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

133-142

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Auteurs

Catherine E Scarff (CE)

Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Margaret Bearman (M)

Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Neville Chiavaroli (N)

Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Steve Trumble (S)

Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH