Comparing the Cobas Liat Influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial virus assay with multiplex nucleic acid testing.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Child, Preschool
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
/ methods
Female
Humans
Infant
Influenza A virus
/ isolation & purification
Influenza B virus
/ isolation & purification
Influenza, Human
/ diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections
/ diagnosis
Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human
/ isolation & purification
Sensitivity and Specificity
Young Adult
influenza virus
nucleic acid amplification testing
point-of-care test
respiratory syncytial virus
turn-around time
Journal
Journal of medical virology
ISSN: 1096-9071
Titre abrégé: J Med Virol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7705876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
30
05
2018
accepted:
13
10
2018
pubmed:
23
10
2018
medline:
18
3
2020
entrez:
23
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) detection with short turn-around-time (TAT) is pivotal for rapid decisions regarding treatment and infection control. However, negative rapid testing results may come from poor assay sensitivity or from influenza-like illnesses caused by other community-acquired respiratory viruses (CARVs). We prospectively compared the performance of Cobas Liat Influenza A/B and RSV assay (LIAT) with our routine multiplexNAT-1 (xTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel; Luminex) and multiplexNAT-2 (ePlex-RPP; GenMark Diagnostics) using 194 consecutive nasopharyngeal swabs from patients with influenza-like illness during winter 2017/2018. Discordant results were reanalyzed by specific in-house quantitative nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT). LIAT was positive for influenza virus-A, -B, and RSV in 18 (9.3%), 13 (6.7%), and 55 (28.4%) samples, and negative in 108 samples. Other CARVs were detected by multiplexNAT in 66 (34.0%) samples. Concordant results for influenza and RSV were seen in 190 (97.9%), discordant results in 4 (2.1%), which showed low-level RSV (<40 000 copies/mL). Sensitivity and specificity of LIAT for influenza-A, -B, and RSV were 100%, 100% and 100%, and 100%, 99.5% and 100%, respectively. The average TAT of LIAT was 20 minutes compared to 6 hours and 2 hours for the multiplexNAT-1 and -2, respectively. Thus, LIAT demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity for influenza and RSV, which together with the simple sample processing and short TAT renders this assay suitable for near-patient testing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30345524
doi: 10.1002/jmv.25344
pmc: PMC7166997
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
582-587Informations de copyright
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
J Med Virol. 2019 Apr;91(4):582-587
pubmed: 30345524
J Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;209 Suppl 3:S120-6
pubmed: 24966192
J Med Virol. 2016 Aug;88(8):1319-24
pubmed: 26856438
Transpl Infect Dis. 2009 Apr;11(2):100-5
pubmed: 19175540
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2015 Dec 04;5(4):236-45
pubmed: 26716012
J Clin Virol. 2017 Oct;95:5-9
pubmed: 28818691
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(2):258-66
pubmed: 23024295
J Formos Med Assoc. 2018 Feb;117(2):132-140
pubmed: 28420553
J Clin Virol. 2015 Jun;67:43-6
pubmed: 25959157
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 19;68(7):1126-1128
pubmed: 30099498
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Mar;47(3):527-32
pubmed: 19129410
Lancet. 2010 May 1;375(9725):1545-55
pubmed: 20399493
J Clin Virol. 2014 Oct;61(2):211-5
pubmed: 25052332
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jun;55(6):1938-1945
pubmed: 28404682
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 27;342(4):225-31
pubmed: 10648763
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Oct;57(8):1069-77
pubmed: 23876395
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 1;46(3):402-12
pubmed: 18181739
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 26;167(4):354-60
pubmed: 17242309
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Nov;54(11):2763-2766
pubmed: 27582513
J Infect Dis. 2011 Oct 1;204(7):996-1002
pubmed: 21881113
J Med Virol. 2017 Aug;89(8):1382-1386
pubmed: 28213975
JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):179-86
pubmed: 12517228
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jan;41(1):149-54
pubmed: 12517840
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jan 24;56(2):
pubmed: 29212701