Heterosis in cattle crossbreeding schemes in tropical regions: meta-analysis of effects of breed combination, trait type, and climate on level of heterosis.
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jan 2019
01 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
16
07
2018
accepted:
15
10
2018
pubmed:
23
10
2018
medline:
26
2
2019
entrez:
23
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of animal trait, breed combination, and climate on the expressed levels of heterosis in crossbreeding schemes using tropical cattle. A meta-analysis of 42 studies was carried out with 518 heterosis estimates. In total, 62.5% of estimates were found to be significantly different from zero, the majority of which (89.8%) were beneficial for the studied trait. Trait and breed combination were shown to have a significant effect on the size of heterosis (P < 0.001 and P = 0.044, respectively). However, climate did not have a significant effect. Health, longevity, and milk production traits showed the highest heterosis (31.84 ± 10.73%, 35.13 ± 14.35%, and 35.15 ± 3.29%, respectively), whereas fertility, growth, and maternal traits showed moderate heterosis (12.02 ± 4.10%, 12.25 ± 2.69%, and 15.69 ± 3.26%, respectively). Crosses between breeds from different types showed moderate to high heterosis ranging from 9.95 ± 4.53% to 19.53 ± 3.62%, whereas crosses between breeds from the same type did not express heterosis that was significantly different from zero. These results show that heterosis has significant and favorable impact on productivity of cattle farming in tropical production systems, particularly in terms of fitness but also milk production traits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30346552
pii: 5139663
doi: 10.1093/jas/sky406
pmc: PMC6313114
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
29-34Références
Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Aug;83 ( Pt 2):103-9
pubmed: 10469197
J Anim Sci. 2001 Jul;79(7):1643-9
pubmed: 11465349
J Anim Sci. 2001 Sep;79(9):2307-19
pubmed: 11583417
Genetics. 2007 Oct;177(2):1059-70
pubmed: 17720924
Anim Genet. 2009 Apr;40(2):176-84
pubmed: 19067671
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Oct 31;11:318
pubmed: 22039837
Animal. 2008 Aug;2(8):1203-14
pubmed: 22443733
Biol Lett. 2013 Apr 10;9(3):20130169
pubmed: 23576780
PLoS One. 2014 May 29;9(5):e96084
pubmed: 24875496
Anim Genet. 2014 Oct;45(5):618-28
pubmed: 24975026
J Anim Sci. 2015 Jan;93(1):46-52
pubmed: 25568356
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015 Aug;14(8):2056-71
pubmed: 25971257
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Mar 29;48:23
pubmed: 27025270
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jul;99(7):5681-5689
pubmed: 27132092
Evolution. 1991 May;45(3):622-629
pubmed: 28568822
J Dairy Sci. 1985 Sep;68(9):2418-35
pubmed: 3840812
Science. 1994 Oct 14;266(5183):271-3
pubmed: 7939661
J Anim Sci. 1993 Feb;71(2):326-33
pubmed: 8440651
J Anim Sci. 1997 Apr;75(4):920-5
pubmed: 9110202