The American Joint Commission Cancer 8th Edition Prognostic Stage Including Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score: Impact on Staging of Early Breast Cancer.


Journal

Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology
ISSN: 1423-0291
Titre abrégé: Pathobiology
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9007504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 27 07 2018
accepted: 30 08 2018
pubmed: 23 10 2018
medline: 10 8 2019
entrez: 23 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The American Joint Commission Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual 8th edition introduced a breast cancer (BC) Prognostic Stage (PS) that combines tumour grade, oestrogen (ER), progesterone (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) receptor status with Anatomic TNM Stage (AS). In a further modification, patients with early BC and an Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score (RS) < 11 are assigned to PS 1A irrespective of grade and size up to 5 cm. This study profiles the impact of these changes on staging in patients with early BC and RS < 11. A total of 127 patients, with primary BC and RS < 11, were identified from a consecutive series of 729 patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, lymph node-negative, primary BC whose tumours were tested using the Oncotype DX® 21 multigene assay. Each patient was assigned AS, PS, and RS-modified PS, and staging categories were compared. Applying AS, 100 patients were stage IA and 27 IIA. Applying PS, 89 were stage IA, 33 IB, 4 IIA, and 1 IIB. All patients were IA according to RS-modified PS. Comparing PS to AS, 26.7% of patients (n = 34) changed stage, 9.4% (n = 12) to a higher and 17.3% (n = 22) to a lower stage. RS-modified PS versus AS resulted in downstaging in 21.3% (n = 27). Comparing PS modified by RS to PS alone, 29.9% (n = 38) were downstaged. Application of PS and RS-modified PS results in tumour downstaging in approximately 20% of patients with early BC. Upstaging was observed in 9% of patients when staged according to PS and was primarily due to the impact of high histological grade.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The American Joint Commission Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual 8th edition introduced a breast cancer (BC) Prognostic Stage (PS) that combines tumour grade, oestrogen (ER), progesterone (PgR), and human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) receptor status with Anatomic TNM Stage (AS). In a further modification, patients with early BC and an Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score (RS) < 11 are assigned to PS 1A irrespective of grade and size up to 5 cm. This study profiles the impact of these changes on staging in patients with early BC and RS < 11.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 127 patients, with primary BC and RS < 11, were identified from a consecutive series of 729 patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, lymph node-negative, primary BC whose tumours were tested using the Oncotype DX® 21 multigene assay. Each patient was assigned AS, PS, and RS-modified PS, and staging categories were compared.
RESULTS RESULTS
Applying AS, 100 patients were stage IA and 27 IIA. Applying PS, 89 were stage IA, 33 IB, 4 IIA, and 1 IIB. All patients were IA according to RS-modified PS. Comparing PS to AS, 26.7% of patients (n = 34) changed stage, 9.4% (n = 12) to a higher and 17.3% (n = 22) to a lower stage. RS-modified PS versus AS resulted in downstaging in 21.3% (n = 27). Comparing PS modified by RS to PS alone, 29.9% (n = 38) were downstaged.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Application of PS and RS-modified PS results in tumour downstaging in approximately 20% of patients with early BC. Upstaging was observed in 9% of patients when staged according to PS and was primarily due to the impact of high histological grade.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30347405
pii: 000493363
doi: 10.1159/000493363
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Receptors, Estrogen 0
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

77-82

Informations de copyright

© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Auteurs

Roisin O'Cearbhaill (R)

Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

John M Gannon (JM)

School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Ruth S Prichard (RS)

Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Janice M Walshe (JM)

Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Enda McDermott (E)

Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Cecily M Quinn (CM)

School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, c.quinn@svuh.ie.
Department of Histopathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, c.quinn@svuh.ie.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH