Early Implant Failure Associated With Patient Factors, Surgical Manipulations, and Systemic Conditions.


Journal

Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
ISSN: 1532-849X
Titre abrégé: J Prosthodont
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
accepted: 09 08 2018
pubmed: 24 10 2018
medline: 27 11 2019
entrez: 24 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Systematic monitoring of important clinical outcomes is increasingly important for health-care decision making, especially in the context of continuous quality improvement. Dental implant failure within the first year (early failure) has been previously shown to be more common than subsequent failure. The purpose of this study was to identify associations between early implant failure and patient factors, surgical manipulations, and systemic conditions. The authors retrospectively identified the records of consecutive adult patients with dental implants seen between 2000 and 2014 in the Department of Dental Specialties, at the Mayo Clinic. Demographic, surgical, and medical data were extracted from the database and individual medical records to determine time to first implant failure. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations of demographic, surgical, and systemic conditions with implant failure during the first year post-implantation, summarized as hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]). Among 8540 implants identified during the study period, 362 (4.2%) failed within the first year of placement at a mean (SD) of 129 (96) days after placement. On univariate analysis, most candidate predictors were not shown to influence first-year failure. Preplacement surgical manipulations associated with increased early implant failure were bone augmentation only (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.02-2.05; p = 0.04), socket preservation (HR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.33-5.38; p = 0.006), and xenogenic material (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.11-4.04; p = 0.02). Alveoloplasty only at placement was associated with decreased early implant failure (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.65; p = 0.001). Overall, 318 implants (3.7%) had surgical complications within the first year of placement at a mean (SD) of 110 (114) days after placement; any surgical complication was significantly associated with early implant failure (hazard ratio, 15.84; 95% CI, 11.10-22.61; p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, and implant era, no single or multiple medical condition(s) and no single or multiple medication(s) increased patient risk of implant failure in the first year after placement. These findings support a targeted effort to reduce the incidence of surgical complications to reduce early failure of dental implants.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30350385
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12978
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dental Implants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

623-633

Informations de copyright

© 2018 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Auteurs

Alan B Carr (AB)

Department of Dental Specialties, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Noura Arwani (N)

Department of Dental Specialties, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Christine M Lohse (CM)

Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Ricardo L Vidal Gonzalez (RLV)

Department of Dental Specialties, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Olivia M Muller (OM)

Department of Dental Specialties, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Thomas J Salinas (TJ)

Department of Dental Specialties, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH