Complications Related to the Initial Trocar Insertion of 3 Different Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Complication
Laparoscopy
Network meta-analysis
Systematic review
Trocar insertion
Journal
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
ISSN: 1553-4669
Titre abrégé: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101235322
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
04
03
2018
revised:
30
05
2018
accepted:
18
06
2018
pubmed:
24
10
2018
medline:
7
8
2019
entrez:
24
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This systematic review aimed to investigate complications related to initial trocar insertion among 3 different laparoscopic techniques: Veress needle (VN) entry, direct trocar entry (DTE), and open entry (OE). A literature search was completed, and complications were assessed. Major vessel injury, gastrointestinal injury, and solid organ injury were defined as major complications. Minor complications were defined as subcutaneous emphysema, extraperitoneal insufflation, omental emphysema, trocar site bleeding, and trocar site infection. Arm-based network meta-analyses were performed to identify the differences in complications among the 3 techniques. Seventeen studies were included in the quantitative analysis. DTE resulted in fewer major complications when compared with VN entry although the difference was not significant (p = .23) as well as significantly fewer minor complications (p < .001). There were no significant differences in minor complications when comparing OE and DTE (p = .74). Fewer major complications were observed with OE compared with VN entry although the difference was not significant (p = .31). There were significantly fewer minor complications for patients who underwent OE (p = .01). DTE patients experienced the least number of minor complications followed by VN entry and OE. In conclusion, major complications are extremely rare, and all 3 insertion methods can be performed without mortality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30352290
pii: S1553-4650(18)31316-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.06.023
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
63-70Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.