Artificial neural networks and risk stratification in emergency departments.
Decision Support Techniques
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ organization & administration
Health Priorities
/ standards
Hospitalization
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Inventions
/ standards
Logistic Models
Nerve Net
Prognosis
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Syncope
/ diagnosis
Artificial neural networks (ANNs)
Decision processes
Emergency departments (ERs)
Risk stratification
Syncope
Journal
Internal and emergency medicine
ISSN: 1970-9366
Titre abrégé: Intern Emerg Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101263418
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
25
06
2018
accepted:
16
10
2018
pubmed:
26
10
2018
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
25
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Emergency departments are characterized by the need for quick diagnosis under pressure. To select the most appropriate treatment, a series of rules to support decision-making has been offered by scientific societies. The effectiveness of these rules affects the appropriateness of treatment and the hospitalization of patients. Analyzing a sample of 1844 patients and focusing on the decision to hospitalize a patient after a syncope event to prevent severe short-term outcomes, this work proposes a new algorithm based on neural networks. Artificial neural networks are a non-parametric technique with the well-known ability to generalize behaviors, and they can thus predict severe short-term outcomes with pre-selected levels of sensitivity and specificity. This innovative technique can outperform the traditional models, since it does not require a specific functional form, i.e., the data are not supposed to be distributed following a specific design. Based on our results, the innovative model can predict hospitalization with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 79%, significantly increasing the appropriateness of medical treatment and, as a result, hospital efficiency. According to Garson's Indexes, the most significant variables are exertion, the absence of symptoms, and the patient's gender. On the contrary, cardio-vascular history, hypertension, and age have the lowest impact on the determination of the subject's health status. The main application of this new technology is the adoption of smart solutions (e.g., a mobile app) to customize the stratification of patients admitted to emergency departments (ED)s after a syncope event. Indeed, the adoption of these smart solutions gives the opportunity to customize risk stratification according to the specific clinical case (i.e., the patient's health status) and the physician's decision-making process (i.e., the desired levels of sensitivity and specificity). Moreover, a decision-making process based on these smart solutions might ensure a more effective use of available resources, improving the management of syncope patients and reducing the cost of inappropriate treatment and hospitalization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30353271
doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1971-2
pii: 10.1007/s11739-018-1971-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
291-299Références
Int J Med Inform. 2000 Jul;57(2-3):181-202
pubmed: 10961573
Health Policy. 2000 Oct;53(3):157-84
pubmed: 10996065
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Autumn;16(4):1147-57
pubmed: 11155834
Int J Med Inform. 2001 Sep;63(1-2):91-9
pubmed: 11518668
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug;17(8):646-9
pubmed: 12213147
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;40(6):575-83
pubmed: 12447333
Health Policy. 2003 Nov;66(2):159-68
pubmed: 14585515
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;43(2):224-32
pubmed: 14747812
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;46(5):431-9
pubmed: 16271675
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Apr;76(4):289-96
pubmed: 16469531
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 May;47(5):448-54
pubmed: 16631985
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22;51(3):276-83
pubmed: 18206736
Heart. 2008 Dec;94(12):1620-6
pubmed: 18519550
Eur J Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(6):318-23
pubmed: 19078833
Health Econ. 2010 Dec;19(12):1404-24
pubmed: 19937614
Health Policy. 2010 Jun;96(1):64-71
pubmed: 20106544
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 May;28(4):432-9
pubmed: 20466221
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;18(7):714-8
pubmed: 21762234
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Nov;80(11):793-802
pubmed: 21917512
Cardiol Clin. 2013 Feb;31(1):27-38
pubmed: 23217685
Health Policy. 2013 Nov;113(1-2):13-9
pubmed: 24176290
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;64(6):649-55.e2
pubmed: 24882667
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jun;16(5):561-7
pubmed: 25005790
Eur Heart J. 2016 May 14;37(19):1493-8
pubmed: 26242712
Health Policy. 2016 Jan;120(1):111-9
pubmed: 26744086
Europace. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1891-1895
pubmed: 28017935
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Oct;33(4):e1100-e1111
pubmed: 30052282
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Feb 18;7(8):728-737
pubmed: 30078293
Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;7(3):219-25
pubmed: 8595458
Am J Med. 1998 Apr;104(4):374-80
pubmed: 9576412