National Testing of the Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey and Implications for Adjustment in Scoring.


Journal

Medical care
ISSN: 1537-1948
Titre abrégé: Med Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0230027

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 27 10 2018
medline: 14 6 2019
entrez: 27 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The emergency department (ED) setting is unique and measuring quality of care in the ED requires the development of ED-specific tools. The Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey was designed to measure patient experience in the ED setting. Describe results from the Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey including respondent characteristics and reported patient experience, and examine factors, including mode of survey administration, associated with response propensity and response patterns. In total, 16,006 discharges were sampled from 50 hospitals nationwide to receive the survey using a mode experiment design. Logistic regression modeled response propensity; linear regression examined associations between response patterns and patient characteristics and mode. In total, 3122 survey respondents. Measures of patient experience. Patients reported that hospitals consistently informed them of the purpose of any new medications (84% yes, definitely), but did not consistently explain their possible side effects (53%). Age, education, health, and arrival by ambulance were significantly associated with response patterns. There were significant differences in response rate by mode: 29% mixed mode, 22% telephone only and 14% mail only. Mode of administration was significantly associated with response patterns whereby patients surveyed using telephone-only or mixed mode tended to respond more positively than those surveyed using mail only. There is room for improvement in terms of patient experience in the ED setting. Effects of patient characteristics and survey mode on responses were large enough to necessitate appropriate adjustments if hospitals are to be compared in the future.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The emergency department (ED) setting is unique and measuring quality of care in the ED requires the development of ED-specific tools. The Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey was designed to measure patient experience in the ED setting.
OBJECTIVES
Describe results from the Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey including respondent characteristics and reported patient experience, and examine factors, including mode of survey administration, associated with response propensity and response patterns.
RESEARCH DESIGN
In total, 16,006 discharges were sampled from 50 hospitals nationwide to receive the survey using a mode experiment design. Logistic regression modeled response propensity; linear regression examined associations between response patterns and patient characteristics and mode.
SUBJECTS
In total, 3122 survey respondents.
MEASURES
Measures of patient experience.
RESULTS
Patients reported that hospitals consistently informed them of the purpose of any new medications (84% yes, definitely), but did not consistently explain their possible side effects (53%). Age, education, health, and arrival by ambulance were significantly associated with response patterns. There were significant differences in response rate by mode: 29% mixed mode, 22% telephone only and 14% mail only. Mode of administration was significantly associated with response patterns whereby patients surveyed using telephone-only or mixed mode tended to respond more positively than those surveyed using mail only.
CONCLUSIONS
There is room for improvement in terms of patient experience in the ED setting. Effects of patient characteristics and survey mode on responses were large enough to necessitate appropriate adjustments if hospitals are to be compared in the future.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30363023
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001005
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

42-48

Auteurs

Layla Parast (L)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

Megan Mathews (M)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

Anagha Tolpadi (A)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

Marc Elliott (M)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

Elizabeth Flow-Delwiche (E)

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.

Kirsten Becker (K)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH