Precision Inhibitory Stimulation of Individual-Specific Cortical Hubs Disrupts Information Processing in Humans.
hubs
individual variability
network neuroscience
noninvasive brain stimulation
resting-state fMRI
Journal
Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
ISSN: 1460-2199
Titre abrégé: Cereb Cortex
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9110718
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 08 2019
14 08 2019
Historique:
received:
22
08
2018
revised:
20
09
2018
pubmed:
27
10
2018
medline:
6
10
2020
entrez:
27
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a promising treatment for psychiatric and neurologic conditions, but outcomes are variable across treated individuals. In principle, precise targeting of individual-specific features of functional brain networks could improve the efficacy of NIBS interventions. Network theory predicts that the role of a node in a network can be inferred from its connections; as such, we hypothesized that targeting individual-specific "hub" brain areas with NIBS should impact cognition more than nonhub brain areas. Here, we first demonstrate that the spatial positioning of hubs is variable across individuals but reproducible within individuals upon repeated imaging. We then tested our hypothesis in healthy individuals using a prospective, within-subject, double-blind design. Inhibition of a hub with continuous theta burst stimulation disrupted information processing during working-memory more than inhibition of a nonhub area, despite targets being separated by only a few centimeters on the right middle frontal gyrus of each subject. Based upon these findings, we conclude that individual-specific brain network features are functionally relevant and could leveraged as stimulation sites in future NIBS interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30364937
pii: 5144871
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy270
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3912-3921Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.