Actively open-minded thinking in politics.
Actively open-minded thinking
Confirmation bias
Myside bias
Overconfidence
Politics
Journal
Cognition
ISSN: 1873-7838
Titre abrégé: Cognition
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0367541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
28
04
2018
revised:
27
08
2018
accepted:
07
10
2018
pubmed:
28
10
2018
medline:
23
7
2020
entrez:
28
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The concept of actively open-minded thinking (AOT) provides standards for evaluation of thinking, which apply both to our own thinking and to the thinking of others. AOT is important for good citizenship for three reasons: it provides a prescription for individual thinking about political decisions; it serves as a social norm (when others agree); and, perhaps most importantly, it provides a standard for knowing which sources to trust, including politicians and pundits. I provide a current account of AOT as a general prescriptive theory that defines a standard or norm for all thinking, with emphasis on its role in the judgment of the thinking of others, and in maintaining appropriate confidence. I also contrast AOT with other standards. AOT does not assume that more thinking is always better, and it implies that low confidence in the results of thinking is often warranted and beneficial. I discuss the measurement of AOT and its relation to politics. Finally, I report two preliminary studies of AOT in judgments of others thoughts, and the role of confidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30366602
pii: S0010-0277(18)30262-2
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8-18Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.