[Antibiotic treatment vs. appendectomy for non-perforated appendicitis in adults].
Antibiotische Therapie vs. Appendektomie bei nichtperforierter Appendizitis im Erwachsenenalter.
Antibiotics
Conservative treatment
Effectiveness
Laparoscopy
Wound pain
Journal
Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen
ISSN: 1433-0385
Titre abrégé: Chirurg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 16140410R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
28
10
2018
medline:
8
8
2019
entrez:
28
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For decades, the mandatory treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis was urgent appendicectomy. This dogma has now been questioned by several randomized controlled trials, which demonstrated the safety of antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis without increased morbidity and mortality. The efficacy of this conservative treatment, however, is inferior to surgery: Within the first year after antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis, approximately 30% of patients require appendicectomy. Within 5 years the rate of appendicectomy increases to 40% and the life-long risk of appendicectomy after conservative treatment can be expected to be even higher. The advantages of conservative treatment of appendicitis are faster recovery and the lack of postoperative wound pain; however, all currently available trials compared conservative treatment almost exclusively with conventional appendicectomy, trials comparing laparoscopic appendicectomy to antibiotics are currently not available. As laparoscopic appendicectomy is a well-established and safe treatment ubiquitously available in Germany, conservative treatment in patients with uncomplicated appendicitis cannot generally be recommended. As antibiotic treatment is a less effective but equally safe procedure, it can be offered to selected patients only.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30367206
doi: 10.1007/s00104-018-0756-5
pii: 10.1007/s00104-018-0756-5
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
ger
Pagination
178-182Références
World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):1033-7
pubmed: 16736333
Br J Surg. 2009 May;96(5):473-81
pubmed: 19358184
World J Surg. 2010 Feb;34(2):199-209
pubmed: 20041249
Dig Surg. 2011;28(3):210-21
pubmed: 21540609
Lancet. 2011 May 7;377(9777):1573-9
pubmed: 21550483
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;9(12):1072-7
pubmed: 21699818
Surgery. 2011 Oct;150(4):673-83
pubmed: 22000179
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 09;(11):CD008359
pubmed: 22071846
J Surg Res. 2012 Jun 15;175(2):185-90
pubmed: 22099604
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012 Apr;13(2):74-84
pubmed: 22364604
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25
pubmed: 2239906
BMJ. 2012 Apr 05;344:e2156
pubmed: 22491789
Prescrire Int. 2014 Jun;23(150):158-60
pubmed: 25121154
JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2340-8
pubmed: 26080338
Br J Surg. 2016 May;103(6):656-667
pubmed: 26990957
World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2305-18
pubmed: 27199000
Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):889-900
pubmed: 27759621
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Dec;223(6):814-824.e2
pubmed: 27793458
Br J Surg. 2017 Sep;104(10):1355-1361
pubmed: 28677879
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;43(11):2067-2075
pubmed: 28942236
Updates Surg. 2017 Dec;69(4):531-540
pubmed: 29101666
JAMA. 2018 Sep 25;320(12):1259-1265
pubmed: 30264120
Br J Surg. 1995 Feb;82(2):166-9
pubmed: 7749676