Perceptions and Practice Patterns of Holmium Laser Goggles in Endourological Procedures: An Unnecessary Evil?


Journal

Journal of endourology
ISSN: 1557-900X
Titre abrégé: J Endourol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8807503

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 30 10 2018
medline: 27 3 2020
entrez: 30 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The holmium laser is used increasingly for a wide array of urological procedures. Laser safety goggles are mandatory at many centers for individuals within the nominal hazard zone, as set out by the institution. Recent ex vivo studies suggest standard eye wear may be equally as protective. We sought to evaluate the perceptions and practice patterns of laser safety goggles in urology. A 24-question survey was sent out through e-mail to an international e-mail list of ∼2000 urologists that were members of the Endourological Society. Data were collected anonymously using Survey Monkey. A total of 264 (14%) urologists completed the survey. Thirty-four percent worked in the community, whereas 63% worked at an academic institution. Ninety-seven percent routinely used the holmium laser. The most common uses were lithotripsy (99%), tissue incision (71%), tumor ablation (58%), and prostate ablation (26%). Formal laser training and institutional laser safety policies were reported in 76% and 64%, respectively. Forty percent of respondents routinely wore laser safety goggles. Laser adverse events were witnessed by 19%, but there were no eye injuries reported. Seventy percent of surgeons felt that laser safety goggles may impair their vision. When presented with the information that regular eye glasses may be as effective as laser goggles for preventing harm, the majority (86%) would opt for regular eye wear. Laser safety eyewear practice patterns vary greatly. Many centers have adopted policies for universal mandatory laser goggles in the operating room. With over two thirds of surgeons suggesting laser goggles impair their vision, and recent literature suggesting regular eye wear is equivalent in preventing laser-associated eye injuries, laser goggle safety policies should be updated to better match the potential hazards inherent to the device.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30369249
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0432
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

146-150

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Nicholas R Paterson (NR)

1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Ryan Fitzpatrick (R)

1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Brian Blew (B)

1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

John Denstedt (J)

2 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

James Watterson (J)

1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH