Use of pre-operative imaging for symptomatic uterine myomas during pregnancy: a case report and a systematic literature review.
Laparoscopy myomectomy
Laparotomy myomectomy
Leiomyoma
Magnetic resonance imaging
Pregnancy
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
21
03
2018
accepted:
17
10
2018
pubmed:
31
10
2018
medline:
10
1
2020
entrez:
31
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Uterine fibroids (UFs) occur in 10% of pregnancies and may lead to severe maternal-fetal complications, mainly depending on UFs characteristics and the distance to the uterine cavity (UC). When symptomatic, UFs are managed medically. Nevertheless, in about 2% of cases, surgery becomes necessary. Entry into the UC should be avoided during myomectomy. Consequentially, pre-operative assessment of this risk could be beneficial. Ultrasonography (US) represents the gold standard for UFs assessment; however, scarce evidence has been produced to assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of the present study was to summarize current evidence about the pre-operative use of imaging techniques for UFs during pregnancy. A systematic research of the literature was conducted in Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect and the Cochrane Library, including case reports and case series. A case report was also discussed. We collected data regarding patients, imaging assessment, UFs characteristics, surgical information, timing and modality of delivery. According to our search strategy, 66 articles were selected and 210 patients were included. US assessment was reported in 36 (17%) cases. MRI was reported in 10 (4.7%) cases. Only in one case, MRI was used to measure the distance between UFs and UC. US allows an adequate pre-operative evaluation of anterior, submucosal or pedunculated symptomatic UFs in pregnancy. However, compared to US, MRI may provide a more accurate evaluation of multiple, large, intramural or posterior UFs and could measure the distance between UFs and UC more accurately.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30374647
doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4948-5
pii: 10.1007/s00404-018-4948-5
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM