Influence of Temperature on the Efficacy of Foliar Insecticide Sprays Against Sugarcane Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Populations in Grain Sorghum.


Journal

Journal of economic entomology
ISSN: 1938-291X
Titre abrégé: J Econ Entomol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985127R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 02 2019
Historique:
received: 26 03 2018
pubmed: 31 10 2018
medline: 4 6 2019
entrez: 31 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The use of foliar insecticide sprays at low temperatures may result in decreased efficacy in grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor L. Moench, for control of sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner). Sulfoxaflor and flupyradifurone were evaluated to determine the impact of temperature on their efficacy against sugarcane aphid in grain sorghum. Sorghum was treated at the soft dough growth stage with sulfoxaflor and flupyradifurone, as well as an untreated check. Leaf discs were pulled at various intervals from 0 to 10 d after treatment, placed in water agar plates, infested with aphids, placed in growth chambers at 15.5°C or 29.4°C, and evaluated 48 h after each interval. In 2015, both insecticides resulted in similar levels of sugarcane aphid mortality and efficacy decreased at a similar rate at 15.5°C. At 29.0°C, flupyradifurone resulted in greater mortality of sugarcane aphid than sulfoxaflor as length of time after treatment increased, suggesting that it provides longer residual control than sulfoxaflor. In 2016, both insecticides provided poor control of sugarcane aphid at 15.5°C for all time intervals. At 29.0°C, flupyradifurone provided overall better control than sulfoxaflor. These data suggest that lower temperatures can reduce the efficacy of both sulfoxaflor and flupyradifurone. In addition, flupyradifurone appeared to provide longer residual control and overall better control of sugarcane aphid than sulfoxaflor. If lower temperatures occur when sugarcane aphid populations exceed current thresholds, weather forecast should be considered in pest management decision-making process.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30376107
pii: 5146785
doi: 10.1093/jee/toy315
doi:

Substances chimiques

Insecticides 0
Pyridines 0
Sulfur Compounds 0
sulfoxaflor 671W88OY8K
flupyradifurone 8H7JT159D0
4-Butyrolactone OL659KIY4X

Types de publication

Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

196-200

Auteurs

Brittany Etheridge (B)

Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.

Jeffrey Gore (J)

Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS.

Angus L Catchot (AL)

Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.

Donald R Cook (DR)

Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS.

Fred R Musser (FR)

Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.

Erick J Larson (EJ)

Department of Plant and Soil Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH