Femoral head subchondral impaction on CT: what does it mean in patients with acetabular fracture?
Acetabular fracture
CT
Femoral head
Impaction
Journal
Skeletal radiology
ISSN: 1432-2161
Titre abrégé: Skeletal Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7701953
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
05
07
2018
accepted:
12
10
2018
revised:
11
10
2018
pubmed:
6
11
2018
medline:
8
5
2019
entrez:
6
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the prevalence of isolated femoral head impactions associated with acetabular fractures and to assess whether impactions may be predictive of the development of delayed major complications requiring total hip arthroplasty. A total of 128 consecutive adult patients with acetabular fracture and no femoral head fracture were included. Admission CTs were re-interpreted for the presence of hip dislocation and femoral head impactions. Radiological and clinical reports were reviewed in patients in whom conservative management of the femoral head was attempted, to determine if total hip arthroplasty was eventually required over a 48-month follow-up period. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess whether impaction is an independent predictor of failure of conservative management. Impaction was found in 40% of all patients (51 out of 128), in 58% of those with dislocation (19 out of 33), and in 34% of those without dislocation (32 out of 95; p < 0.05). One hundred and five patients underwent conservative management of the femoral head; 12.5% of them (13 out of 105) eventually required total hip arthroplasty. An impaction was present in 77% of the latter (10 out of 13) and in 33% of patients with successful conservative management (30 out of 92; p = 0.0042). At multivariate analysis, impaction and dislocation were significantly and independently associated with a higher risk for delayed total hip arthroplasty (odds ratio of 4.8 and 4.0 respectively). Femoral head impactions are frequently seen on CT of patients with acetabular fractures; they are independent predictive factors for the need for delayed total hip arthroplasty. They should be systematically mentioned in the CT report.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30393834
doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3100-8
pii: 10.1007/s00256-018-3100-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
939-948Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Dec;81(12):1747-70
pubmed: 10608388
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Sep;(366):205-16
pubmed: 10627737
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Feb;(407):173-86
pubmed: 12567145
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957 Oct;39-A(5):1027-42 passim
pubmed: 13475403
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Dec;46:1615-46
pubmed: 14239854
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jul;87(7):969-73
pubmed: 15972913
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Oct;96(6):623-31
pubmed: 20729157
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Jul;155(1):93-4
pubmed: 2112874
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Nov;155(5):1049-52
pubmed: 2120934
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Feb;99(1 Suppl):S53-66
pubmed: 23357042
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Feb;23(2):155-63
pubmed: 23412446
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 May;99(3):281-90
pubmed: 23562708
Injury. 2012 Dec;43 Suppl 2:S33-41
pubmed: 23622990
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Dec;99(8):929-35
pubmed: 24183746
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Feb;135(2):227-233
pubmed: 25575718
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Dec;55(8):1629-32
pubmed: 4217797
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1632-45
pubmed: 8934477