Achieving LDL cholesterol target levels <1.81 mmol/L may provide extra cardiovascular protection in patients at high risk: Exploratory analysis of the Standard Versus Intensive Statin Therapy for Patients with Hypercholesterolaemia and Diabetic Retinopathy study.
Aged
Cardiovascular Diseases
/ epidemiology
Cholesterol, LDL
/ metabolism
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ complications
Diabetic Retinopathy
/ etiology
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
/ metabolism
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Hyperlipidemias
/ complications
Intention to Treat Analysis
Japan
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Care Planning
Primary Prevention
Proportional Hazards Models
cardiovascular disease
clinical trial
diabetic retinopathy
dyslipidaemia
lipid-lowering therapy
Journal
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism
ISSN: 1463-1326
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Obes Metab
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
27
07
2018
revised:
19
10
2018
accepted:
31
10
2018
pubmed:
6
11
2018
medline:
8
9
2020
entrez:
6
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the benefits of intensive statin therapy on reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated with hyperlipidaemia and retinopathy in a primary prevention setting in Japan. In the intension-to-treat population, intensive therapy [targeting LDL cholesterol <1.81 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL)] was no more effective than standard therapy [LDL cholesterol ≥2.59 to <3.10 mmol/L (≥100 to <120 mg/dL)]; however, after 3 years, the intergroup difference in LDL cholesterol was only 0.72 mmol/L (27.7 mg/dL), and targeted levels were achieved in <50% of patients. We hypothesized that the intergroup difference in CV events would have been statistically significant if more patients had been successfully treated to target. This exploratory post hoc analysis focused on intergroup data from patients who achieved their target LDL cholesterol levels. The primary endpoint was the composite incidence of CV events. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incidence of the primary endpoint in patients who achieved target LDL cholesterol levels in each group. Data were analysed from 1909 patients (intensive: 703; standard: 1206) who achieved target LDL cholesterol levels. LDL cholesterol at 36 months was 1.54 ± 0.30 mmol/L (59.7 ± 11.6 mg/dL) in the intensive group and 2.77 ± 0.46 mmol/L (107.1 ± 17.8 mg/dL) in the standard group (P < 0.05). After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, the composite incidence of CV events or deaths associated with CV events was significantly lower in the intensive than the standard group (HR 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.82; P = 0.007). This post hoc analysis suggests that achieving LDL cholesterol target levels <1.81 mmol/L may more effectively reduce CV events than achieving target levels ≥2.59 to <3.10 mmol/L in patients with hypercholesterolaemia and diabetic retinopathy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30393955
doi: 10.1111/dom.13575
pmc: PMC6587486
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cholesterol, LDL
0
Glycated Hemoglobin A
0
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
0
hemoglobin A1c protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
791-800Informations de copyright
© 2018 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Diabetes. 2004 Dec;53 Suppl 3:S39-47
pubmed: 15561920
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011 Apr;18(2):262-9
pubmed: 21450674
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):791-800
pubmed: 30393955
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Nov;96(11):3448-56
pubmed: 21865372
Diabetes Care. 2011 May;34(5):1238-44
pubmed: 21525504
BMJ. 1998 Mar 14;316(7134):823-8
pubmed: 9549452
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Sep 1;100(5):747-52
pubmed: 17719314
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016 Aug 1;23(8):976-90
pubmed: 26961114
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jan;139(1):92-7
pubmed: 19660392
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1275-1284
pubmed: 29626074
Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):117-25
pubmed: 18191683
Diabetes Care. 2006 Jun;29(6):1220-6
pubmed: 16731999
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Apr 19;57(16):1666-75
pubmed: 21492764