Patients' experience of screening CT colonography with reduced and full bowel preparation in a randomised trial.
CT colonography
Questionnaire
Virtual colonoscopy
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
18
07
2018
accepted:
27
09
2018
revised:
10
09
2018
pubmed:
8
11
2018
medline:
6
6
2019
entrez:
8
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess patients' experience of bowel preparation and procedure for screening CT colonography with reduced (r-CTC) and full cathartic preparation (f-CTC) that showed similar detection rate for advanced neoplasia in a randomised trial. Six hundred seventy-four subjects undergoing r-CTC and 612 undergoing f-CTC in the SAVE trial were asked to complete two pre-examination questionnaires-(1) Life Orientation Test - Revised (LOT-R) assessing optimism and (2) bowel preparation questionnaire-and a post-examination questionnaire evaluating overall experience of CTC screening test. Items were analysed with chi-square and t test separately and pooled. LOT-R was completed by 529 (78%) of r-CTC and by 462 (75%) of f-CTC participants and bowel preparation questionnaire by 531 (79%) subjects in the r-CTC group and by 465 (76%) in the f-CTC group. Post-examination questionnaire was completed by 525 (78%) subjects in the r-CTC group and by 453 (74%) in the f-CTC group. LOT-R average score was not different between r-CTC (14.27 ± 3.66) and f-CTC (14.54 ± 3.35) (p = 0.22). In bowel preparation questionnaire, 88% of r-CTC subjects reported no preparation-related symptoms as compared to 70% of f-CTC subjects (p < 0.001). No interference of bowel preparation with daily activities was reported in 80% of subjects in the r-CTC group as compared to 53% of subjects in the f-CTC group (p < 0.001). In post-examination questionnaire, average scores for discomfort of the procedure were not significantly different between r-CTC (3.53 ± 0.04) and f-CTC (3.59 ± 0.04) groups (p = 0.84). Reduced bowel preparation is better tolerated than full preparation for screening CT colonography. • Reduced bowel preparation is better tolerated than full preparation for screening CT colonography. • Procedure-related discomfort of screening CT colonography is not influenced by bowel preparation. • Males tolerate bowel preparation and CT colonography screening procedure better than females.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30402705
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5808-1
pii: 10.1007/s00330-018-5808-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cathartics
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2457-2464Subventions
Organisme : Regione Toscana (IT)
ID : POR CREO FESR 1.1c
Organisme : Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze (IT)
ID : 2012.0742A2202.3931
Références
Gut. 2012 Nov;61(11):1552-9
pubmed: 22198714
Br J Health Psychol. 2012 May;17(2):432-45
pubmed: 22106985
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 30;108(2):
pubmed: 26719225
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):250-281
pubmed: 29846947
Endoscopy. 2013;45(2):142-50
pubmed: 23335011
Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):873-883
pubmed: 29040021
Clin Radiol. 2011 Jan;66(1):30-7
pubmed: 21147296
J Med Screen. 2005;12(1):20-7
pubmed: 15814015
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1777-83
pubmed: 23211845
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575
pubmed: 27304597
Radiology. 2017 Feb;282(2):399-407
pubmed: 27580426
Acad Radiol. 2009 Jul;16(7):780-9
pubmed: 19375954
Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):1085-92
pubmed: 22422379
Eur Radiol. 2010 Jan;20(1):146-56
pubmed: 19626326
Cancer. 2004 May 15;100(10):2093-103
pubmed: 15139050
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jun;19(5):735-746
pubmed: 28681075
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2018 Mar 21;14:63-69
pubmed: 29643929
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Dec;67(6):1063-78
pubmed: 7815302
Br J Radiol. 2016 Dec;89(1068):20160517
pubmed: 27542076
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jul;191(1):158-67
pubmed: 18562740
Gut. 2017 Aug;66(8):1434-1440
pubmed: 27196588
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Feb;26(1):158-68
pubmed: 26370437
Eur Radiol. 2010 Feb;20(2):348-58
pubmed: 19711082
J Med Screen. 2011;18(3):128-34
pubmed: 22045821
Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul;24(7):1477-86
pubmed: 24817084
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;3(5):326-336
pubmed: 29472116
Trials. 2013 Mar 15;14:74
pubmed: 23497601
Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):692-702
pubmed: 22586008
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr;111(4):516-22
pubmed: 27021193
Eur Radiol. 2010 Feb;20(2):367-76
pubmed: 19707769
Eur Radiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):203-10
pubmed: 25149295
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):55-64
pubmed: 22088831
Eur Radiol. 2016 Aug;26(8):2762-70
pubmed: 26560732
Eur Radiol. 2015 Feb;25(2):331-45
pubmed: 25278245
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Feb;99(2):341-9
pubmed: 15046227
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Jan;36(1 Suppl 1):1-104
pubmed: 22418841