Exploring the Factors Associated With Rejection From a Closed Cybercrime Community.
cybercrime
fraud
hacking
illicit markets
restrictive deterrence
risk avoidance
Journal
International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology
ISSN: 1552-6933
Titre abrégé: Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0333601
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
8
11
2018
medline:
20
3
2020
entrez:
8
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Research examining the illicit online market for cybercrime services operating via web forums, such as malicious software, personal information, and hacking tools, has greatly improved our understanding of the practices of buyers and sellers, and the social forces that structure actor behavior. The majority of these studies are based on open markets, which can be accessed by anyone with minimal barriers to entry. There are, however, closed communities operating online that are thought to operate with greater trust and reliability between participants, as they must be vetted and approved by existing community members. The decision to allow individuals to join a forum may reflect restrictive deterrence practices on the part of existing members, as those applicants may threaten the security or operations of the group. This study utilized a quantitative analysis to understand the factors associated with rejection for individuals who sought membership in the organized and sophisticated closed forum run by and for cybercriminals called Darkode. The findings demonstrated that individuals whose perceived engagement with the hacker community and cybercrime marketplace were considered too risky for membership. The implications of this study for our understanding of restrictive deterrence theory, as well as criminal market operations on and offline were explored in depth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30403151
doi: 10.1177/0306624X18811101
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM