Comparison of high glomerular filtration rate thresholds for identifying hyperfiltration.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Body Mass Index
Body Surface Area
Creatinine
/ blood
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Incidence
Kidney Function Tests
/ methods
Kidney Glomerulus
/ physiopathology
Living Donors
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
/ epidemiology
United States
/ epidemiology
Young Adult
GFR
glomerular volume
hyperfiltration
nephron number
risk factor
Journal
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
ISSN: 1460-2385
Titre abrégé: Nephrol Dial Transplant
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8706402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2020
01 06 2020
Historique:
received:
18
06
2018
accepted:
11
09
2018
pubmed:
8
11
2018
medline:
24
11
2020
entrez:
8
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
High glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is often used as a surrogate for single-nephron hyperfiltration. Our objective was to determine the definition for high GFR that best reflects clinical and structural characteristics of hyperfiltration. We studied living kidney donors at the Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic. Potential donors underwent evaluations that included measured GFR (mGFR) by iothalamate clearance and estimated GFR (eGFR) by the serum creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. High GFR was defined by the 95th percentile for each method (mGFR or eGFR) using either overall or age-specific thresholds. High mGFR was defined as both corrected and uncorrected for body surface area. The association of high GFR by each definition with clinical characteristics and radiologic findings (kidney volume) was assessed. In the subset that donated, the association of high GFR with kidney biopsy findings (nephron number and glomerular volume) and single-nephron GFR was assessed. We studied 3317 potential donors, including 2125 actual donors. The overall 95th percentile for corrected mGFR was 134 mL/min/1.73 m2 and for eGFR was 118 mL/min/1.73 m2. The age-based threshold for uncorrected mGFR was 198 mL/min - 0.943×Age, for corrected mGFR it was 164 mL/min/1.73 m2 - 0.730×Age and for eGFR it was 146 mL/min/1.73 m2 - 0.813×Age. High age-based uncorrected mGFR had the strongest associations with higher single-nephron GFR, larger glomerular volume, larger kidney volume, male gender, higher body mass index and higher 24-h urine albumin, but also had the strongest association with high nephron number. A high age-height-gender-based uncorrected mGFR definition performed almost as well but had a weaker association with nephron number and did not associate with male gender. High age-based uncorrected mGFR showed the most consistent associations reflective of hyperfiltration. However, high age-based uncorrected mGFR has limited clinical utility because it does not distinguish between hyperfiltration and high nephron number.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
High glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is often used as a surrogate for single-nephron hyperfiltration. Our objective was to determine the definition for high GFR that best reflects clinical and structural characteristics of hyperfiltration.
METHODS
We studied living kidney donors at the Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic. Potential donors underwent evaluations that included measured GFR (mGFR) by iothalamate clearance and estimated GFR (eGFR) by the serum creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. High GFR was defined by the 95th percentile for each method (mGFR or eGFR) using either overall or age-specific thresholds. High mGFR was defined as both corrected and uncorrected for body surface area. The association of high GFR by each definition with clinical characteristics and radiologic findings (kidney volume) was assessed. In the subset that donated, the association of high GFR with kidney biopsy findings (nephron number and glomerular volume) and single-nephron GFR was assessed.
RESULTS
We studied 3317 potential donors, including 2125 actual donors. The overall 95th percentile for corrected mGFR was 134 mL/min/1.73 m2 and for eGFR was 118 mL/min/1.73 m2. The age-based threshold for uncorrected mGFR was 198 mL/min - 0.943×Age, for corrected mGFR it was 164 mL/min/1.73 m2 - 0.730×Age and for eGFR it was 146 mL/min/1.73 m2 - 0.813×Age. High age-based uncorrected mGFR had the strongest associations with higher single-nephron GFR, larger glomerular volume, larger kidney volume, male gender, higher body mass index and higher 24-h urine albumin, but also had the strongest association with high nephron number. A high age-height-gender-based uncorrected mGFR definition performed almost as well but had a weaker association with nephron number and did not associate with male gender.
CONCLUSIONS
High age-based uncorrected mGFR showed the most consistent associations reflective of hyperfiltration. However, high age-based uncorrected mGFR has limited clinical utility because it does not distinguish between hyperfiltration and high nephron number.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30403810
pii: 5162971
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy332
pmc: PMC7282825
doi:
Substances chimiques
Creatinine
AYI8EX34EU
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1017-1026Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK090358
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.
Références
BMJ. 2013 Jan 29;346:f324
pubmed: 23360717
Kidney Int. 2006 Jul;70(1):104-10
pubmed: 16723986
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Aug;6(8):1963-72
pubmed: 21737852
Kidney Int. 2014 Mar;85(3):677-85
pubmed: 24067437
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011 Nov;301(5):F1078-87
pubmed: 21775485
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Jan;67(1):49-55
pubmed: 26454686
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Jun;67(6):841-50
pubmed: 26744126
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):382-9
pubmed: 25568216
BMC Nephrol. 2016 Nov 10;17(1):172
pubmed: 27832768
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 May;27(5):1821-5
pubmed: 22140135
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):e0189935
pubmed: 29261774
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Aug;56(2):255-8
pubmed: 20659626
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Dec 7;11(12):2186-2194
pubmed: 27683625
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Sep;70(3):406-414
pubmed: 28549536
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Dec;26(12):3162-78
pubmed: 26038526
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2349-2357
pubmed: 28614683
JAMA. 1990 Dec 5;264(21):2775-80
pubmed: 2146412
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jul;34(7):1546-51
pubmed: 21593291
J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2004 Oct;11(7):438-48
pubmed: 15458740
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jun;5(6):951-3
pubmed: 20448068
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Dec;23(12):3946-52
pubmed: 18622024
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 May;31(5):798-806
pubmed: 26932693
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21;141(12):929-37
pubmed: 15611490
Kidney Int. 2013 Jun;83(6):1169-76
pubmed: 23423253
Kidney Int. 2018 Jan;93(1):195-203
pubmed: 28935213
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 03;7:45522
pubmed: 28368024
Kidney Int. 2009 May;75(10):1079-87
pubmed: 19212414
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Jul;68(1):58-67
pubmed: 26857648
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12
pubmed: 19414839
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Oct;22(10):1931-7
pubmed: 21921144
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Nov 7;9(11):1892-902
pubmed: 25318758
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Mar;17(3):854-62
pubmed: 16452494
J Appl Physiol. 1962 Mar;17:343-8
pubmed: 14005589
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995;10(9):1644-7
pubmed: 8559483
Kidney Int. 2007 Apr;71(8):816-21
pubmed: 17332732
Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Jan;43(1):112-9
pubmed: 14712434
Diabetologia. 2005 Dec;48(12):2486-93
pubmed: 16261309
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jan;28(1):313-320
pubmed: 27401688
Kidney Int. 2013 Jul;84(1):164-73
pubmed: 23447062
Acta Med Scand. 1985;217(2):189-96
pubmed: 3887848