Usefulness of diluted contrast medium for test-scanning of infants scheduled for contrast-enhanced cardiovascular computed tomography angiography.
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
10
11
2018
medline:
9
2
2019
entrez:
10
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the ability of test scans with undiluted and diluted contrast medium (CM) to predict contrast enhancement (CE) on cardiovascular CT angiography (CCTA) images of infants. We divided 120 consecutive infants who had undergone CCTA on a 64-MDCT scanner into two equal groups. In one group, the test bolus consisted of undiluted CM [protocol 1 (P1): injection volume = total body weight × 1.2 ml, injection time 5 s], in the other (P2) it was total body weight × 4.0 ml (CM 15%, saline 85%, injection time 16 s). CE on the test scans was recorded on a 3-point visual scale. We investigated the relation for CE in the pulmonary artery and ascending aorta between the P1 or P2 test scans and CCTA images. While peak CE was observed on all test scans performed with P2, in approximately 10 % of test scans obtained under P1, peak CE was not visualized. There was a strong positive linear correlation for CE of the pulmonary artery and ascending aorta on P2 images (r = 0.61 and r = 0.63, p < 0.01); under P1 the correlation was weak (r = 0.26 and r = 0.33, p < 0.01). Test-scanning with diluted CM revealed the optimal CE peak time and was useful for predicting CE on CCTA scans of the pulmonary artery and ascending aorta in infants with congenital heart disease. Diluted test scans help to select the optimal scan parameters for the CCTA study of infants by using contrast-to-noise-based scanning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30412445
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180572
pmc: PMC6404813
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20180572Références
Acta Radiol. 2015 Jun;56(6):666-72
pubmed: 24938658
Jpn J Radiol. 2011 Jan;29(1):46-50
pubmed: 21264661
J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Jul;19(7):834-835
pubmed: 35598635
Eur Radiol. 2010 Oct;20(10):2503-11
pubmed: 20532783
Radiology. 1996 Sep;200(3):811-5
pubmed: 8756937
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1965 Feb;93:473-9
pubmed: 14258300
Radiology. 2008 Jun;247(3):617-31
pubmed: 18375837
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2013 Sep;36(3):347-54
pubmed: 23797765
Eur Radiol. 2003 Sep;13(9):2155-60
pubmed: 12736754
Acad Radiol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1542-6
pubmed: 25442352
Jpn J Radiol. 2011 Aug;29(7):457-65
pubmed: 21882087
Phys Med. 2013 Jan;29(1):39-47
pubmed: 22182517
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):903-8
pubmed: 20308489
Invest Radiol. 1983 Jul-Aug;18(4):335-40
pubmed: 6618823
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Feb;186(2):379-85
pubmed: 16423942
Clin Radiol. 2016 Nov;71(11):1113-9
pubmed: 27170220
Springerplus. 2016 Dec 1;5(1):2064
pubmed: 27995041
Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Dec;36(12):1273-82
pubmed: 17036235
Pediatr Cardiol. 2016 Mar;37(3):497-503
pubmed: 26563276