Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
/ methods
Bone Resorption
/ classification
Female
Femur
/ injuries
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Salvage Therapy
Treatment Outcome
Bone loss
Dislocation
Megaprosthesis
Proximal femoral replacement
Revision total hip arthroplasty
Journal
International orthopaedics
ISSN: 1432-5195
Titre abrégé: Int Orthop
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7705431
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
19
09
2018
accepted:
29
10
2018
pubmed:
12
11
2018
medline:
7
7
2020
entrez:
12
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proximal femoral replacements (PFRs) have been recently utilized in complex revision arthroplasties where proximal femoral bone is compromised. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes, complications, and survivorship of PFRs as a salvage treatment for severe bone loss after non-oncologic revision total hip arthroplasty. This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent femoral revision surgery using a single design PFR between 2004 and 2013 at our institution. Forty patients (41 hips) were included with a mean age of 64 years (29-90). According to Paprosky classification, 15 femurs had type IIIB defect, and 26 had type IV defect. Patients were followed for a mean of five years (2-10). The average length of reconstruction was 150 mm (81-261). A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the survival of the PFR. A total of nine patients (9 PFRs, 22%) were re-operated upon. Three re-operations were for infection, two for dislocation, two for aseptic loosening, and two for periprosthetic fracture. The survivorship at five years was 95.1% for revision of the femoral stem for aseptic loosening. We did not find length of the segmental reconstruction or the indication for revision, to be a risk factor for implant failure or re-revision. Proximal femoral replacements have shown an acceptable survivorship in non-oncologic revision hip arthroplasties for severe proximal femoral bone loss. The frequent use of constrained liners may decrease the risk of dislocation due to the loss of the abductor mechanism encountered in these complex reconstructions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30415464
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4220-4
pii: 10.1007/s00264-018-4220-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2227-2233Références
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug;24(5):751-8
pubmed: 18977637
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jan;91(1):108-12
pubmed: 19092014
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar;(420):169-75
pubmed: 15057093
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Sep;75(5):697-704
pubmed: 8376423
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Sep;450:164-71
pubmed: 16691142
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Dec;17(8):955-60
pubmed: 12478503
Orthop Surg. 2012 Nov;4(4):203-10
pubmed: 23109303
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):72-79
pubmed: 27093862
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Feb;(371):98-107
pubmed: 10693554
World J Orthop. 2014 Nov 18;5(5):614-22
pubmed: 25405090
Bone Joint J. 2016 Nov;98-B(11):1463-1470
pubmed: 27803221
Bone Joint J. 2017 Mar;99-B(3):325-329
pubmed: 28249971
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2325-34
pubmed: 19294476
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov;29(11):2117-21
pubmed: 25115232
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jun;27(6):829-36.e1
pubmed: 22153950
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):1036-43
pubmed: 17473141
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Jun;71(5):669-78
pubmed: 2732255
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):953-8
pubmed: 16651568
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 4:1-6
pubmed: 14652388
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1507-1514
pubmed: 29366726
Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:141-6
pubmed: 10829170
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Sep;46:1184-97
pubmed: 14214352
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Mar;473(3):820-30
pubmed: 24964884
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Dec;87(12):2693-701
pubmed: 16322619
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Dec;24(8):1241-8
pubmed: 19646843