Timing of Muscle Activation Is Altered During Single-Leg Landing Tasks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at the Time of Return to Sport.
Analysis of Variance
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
/ etiology
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
/ methods
Autografts
Biomechanical Phenomena
/ physiology
Case-Control Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Electromyography
Gracilis Muscle
/ transplantation
Hamstring Muscles
/ physiology
Hamstring Tendons
/ transplantation
Humans
Knee Joint
/ physiology
Male
Muscle Strength
/ physiology
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Patellar Ligament
/ transplantation
Quadriceps Muscle
/ physiology
Recovery of Function
Return to Sport
/ physiology
Time Factors
Young Adult
Journal
Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine
ISSN: 1536-3724
Titre abrégé: Clin J Sport Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9103300
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
13
11
2018
medline:
24
4
2021
entrez:
13
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is well known that alterations in landing mechanics persist for years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R). Nevertheless, existing literature is controversial in reporting successful or unsuccessful recovery of prelanding muscle activation timing after ACL-R. The study aimed at comparing myoelectric and kinematic patterns during landing tasks between ACL-R and healthy subjects. Cross-sectional study. Institutional research laboratory. Fifteen male athletes after ACL-R using patellar tendon and 11 using hamstrings autograft at the time of return to sport were recruited. Fifteen healthy athletes served as control group. Participants performed 4 different single-leg landing tasks arriving onto a force plate. Electromyographic (EMG) activity of knee extensors and flexors, normalized vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), and knee angular displacement were recorded. In all the tasks, preimpact EMG duration was longer in ACL-R (112 ± 28 ms in the knee extensors; 200 ± 34 ms in the knee flexors) compared with healthy participants (74 ± 19 ms in the knee extensors; 153 ± 29 ms in the knee flexors; P < 0.05). Initial contact (IC) and maximum postimpact knee angle were lower in ACL-R (9 ± 7 degrees at IC; 39 ± 12 degrees at maximum flexion) compared with healthy participants (17 ± 9 degrees at IC; 52 ± 15 degrees at maximum flexion; P < 0.05). Normalized vGRF was higher in ACL-R compared with healthy participants (3.4 ± 0.5 and 2.7 ± 0.6; P < 0.05). At the time of return to sport, ACL-R subjects showed altered motor control strategies of single-leg landings. These alterations may lead to uncoordinated movement, hence increasing the risk of reinjury.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30418218
doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000659
pii: 00042752-202011000-00017
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e186-e193Références
Arendt E, Dick R. Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:694–701.
Agel J. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association basketball and soccer: a 13-year review. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:524–531.
Mihata LCS, Beutler AI, Boden BP. Comparing the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury in collegiate lacrosse, soccer, and basketball players: implications for anterior cruciate ligament mechanism and prevention. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:899–904.
Prodromos CC, Han Y, Rogowski J, et al. A meta-analysis of the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears as a function of gender, sport, and a knee injury-reduction regimen. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1320–1325.e6.
Boden BP, Dean GS, Feagin JA, et al. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics. 2000;23:573–578.
Olsen OE. Injury mechanisms for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in team handball: a systematic video analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1002–1012.
Hewett TE, Myer GD. The mechanistic connection between the trunk, knee, and anterior cruciate ligament injury timothy. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2014;39:161–166.
Zebis MK, Andersen LL, Bencke J, et al. Identification of athletes at future risk of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures by neuromuscular screening. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1967–1973.
Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sport Med. 2005;33:492–501.
Theisen D, Rada I, Brau A, et al. Muscle activity onset prior to landing in patients after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016:11:e0155277.
Kan SL, Yuan ZF, Ning GZ, et al. Autograft versus allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4936.
Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1986–1995.
Sajovic M, Vengust V, Komadina R, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1933–1940.
Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:1139–1174.
Thompson S, Salmon L, Waller A, et al. Twenty-year outcomes of a longitudinal prospective evaluation of isolated endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2016;43:2164–2174.
Bryant AL, Newton RU, Steele J. Successful feed-forward strategies following ACL injury and reconstruction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19:988–997.
Gokeler A, Hof AL, Arnold MP, et al. Abnormal landing strategies after ACL reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2010;20:12–19.
Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, et al. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10:361–374.
Rowe P, Myles C, Hillmann S, et al. Validation of flexible electrogoniometry as a measure of joint kinematics. Physiotherapy. 2001;87:479–488.
Labanca L, Laudani L, Casabona A, et al. Early compensatory and anticipatory postural adjustments following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115:1441–1451.
Massion J, Ioffe M, Schmitz C, et al. Acquisition of anticipatory postural adjustments in a bimanual load-lifting task: normal and pathological aspects. Exp Brain Res. 1999;128:229–235.
Tsao H, Hodges PW. Immediate changes in feedforward postural adjustments following voluntary motor training. Exp Brain Res. 2007;181:537–546.
Kanekar N, Aruin AS. Improvement of anticipatory postural adjustments for balance control: effect of a single training session. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015;25:400–405.
Santello M. Review of motor control mechanisms underlying impact absorption from falls. Gait Posture. 2005;21:85–94.
Thomeé R, Kaplan Y, Kvist J, et al. Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1798–1805.
Yabroudi MA, Irrgang JJ. Rehabilitation and return to play after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2013;32:165–175.
Abrams GD, Harris JD, Gupta AK, et al. Functional performance testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Orthop J Sport Med. 2014;2:2325967113518305.
Krosshaug T, Nakamae A, Boden BP, et al. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury in basketball: video analysis of 39 cases. Am J Sports Med. 2006;35:359–367.
Oberländer KD, Brüggemann GP, Höher J, et al. Altered landing mechanics in ACL-reconstructed patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:506–513.
Di Stasi S, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Neuromuscular training to target deficits associated with second anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;43:777–811.
Read PJ, Oliver JL, De Ste Croix MB, et al. Neuromuscular risk factors for knee and ankle ligament injuries in male youth soccer players. Sport Med. 2016;46:1059–1066.
Benjaminse A, Otten B, Gokeler A, et al. Motor learning strategies in basketball players and its implications for ACL injury prevention: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:2365–2376.
Schmitt LC, Paterno MV, Ford KR, et al. Strength asymmetry and landing mechanics at return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:1426–1434.
Xergia SA, Pappas E, Zampeli F, et al. Asymmetries in functional hop tests, lower extremity kinematics, and isokinetic strength persist 6 to 9 months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43:154–162.
Laughlin WA, Weinhandl JT, Kernozek TW, et al. The effects of single-leg landing technique on ACL loading. J Biomech. 2011;44:1845–1851.
Mizrahi J, Susak Z. Analysis of parameters affecting impact force attenuation during landing in human vertical free fall. Eng Med. 1982;11:141–147.
Dufek JS, Bates BT. The evaluation and prediction of impact forces during landings. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22:370–377.
Podraza JT, White SC. Effect of knee flexion angle on ground reaction forces, knee moments and muscle co-contraction during an impact-like deceleration landing: implications for the non-contact mechanism of ACL injury. Knee. 2010;17:291–295.
Aerts I, Cumps E, Verhagen E, et al. A systematic review of different jump-landing variables in relation to injuries. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2013;53:509–519.
Laudani L, Giombini A, Mariani PP, et al. Application of the sit-to-stand movement for the early assessment of functional deficits in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93:189–199.
Labanca L, Laudani L, Menotti F, et al. Asymmetrical lower extremity loading early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a significant predictor of asymmetrical loading at the time of return to sport. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;95:1.
Benjaminse A, Holden S, Myer GD. ACL rupture is a single leg injury but a double leg problem: too much focus on “symmetry” alone and that's not enough! Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:1029–1030.
Greska EK, Cortes N, Ringleb SI, et al. Biomechanical differences related to leg dominance were not found during a cutting task. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2017;27:1328–1336.
van der Harst JJ, Gokeler A, Hof AL. Leg kinematics and kinetics in landing from a single-leg hop for distance. A comparison between dominant and non-dominant leg. Clin Biomech. 2007;22:674–680.