Performance of the Vulnerable Elders Survey 13 screening tool in identifying cancer treatment modification after geriatric assessment in pre-treatment patients: A retrospective analysis.
Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Clinical Decision-Making
Female
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
/ therapy
Geriatric Assessment
/ methods
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ therapy
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Mental Status and Dementia Tests
Neoplasms
/ therapy
Nutritional Status
Patient Health Questionnaire
Patient Selection
Physical Functional Performance
Retrospective Studies
Self Report
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urogenital Neoplasms
/ therapy
Vulnerable Populations
Aged
Frailty
Geriatric assessment
Medical oncology
Modified G8
Neoplasms
Screening
Treatment decision-making
VES-13
Journal
Journal of geriatric oncology
ISSN: 1879-4076
Titre abrégé: J Geriatr Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101534770
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
23
08
2018
revised:
07
10
2018
accepted:
29
10
2018
pubmed:
14
11
2018
medline:
24
6
2020
entrez:
14
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Geriatric assessment (GA) is recommended for older adults ≥ 70 years with cancer to guide treatment selection. Screening tools such as the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) and G6 have been used to identify patients at highest need of GA. Whether either tool predicts a change in oncologic treatment following GA is unclear. Patients attending a geriatric oncology clinic between July 2015 and June 2017 who completed a VES-13 and underwent subsequent GA were included. Clinical information was extracted from a prospectively maintained database. G6 scores were assigned retrospectively. Patients were stratified into those who were "VES-13 positive" (score ≥ 3) and "VES-13 negative" (score < 3). Logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between VES-13 score, G6 score, and treatment modification. Ninety-nine patients were seen prior to initiating cancer treatment. The median VES-13 score was 7; with 81.8% of patients scoring ≥3. The treatment plan was modified in 47.5% of patients after GA. VES-13 score was predictive of treatment plan modification (63.0% among VES-13 positive versus 16.7% among VES-13 negative patients; p = 0.001). G6 performed similarly to the VES-13. The only statistically significant predictor of treatment change in multivariable analysis was performance status. VES-13 positive patients are more likely to undergo treatment modification to reduce treatment intensity or supportive care only. The VES-13 may provide oncologists with a rapid, reliable way of identifying vulnerability in older adults with cancer who may need further GA prior to commencing cancer treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30420323
pii: S1879-4068(18)30338-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.10.018
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
229-234Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.