A Narrative Review of Diabetes Group Visits in Low-Income and Underserved Settings.
Group visits
chronic disease
diabetes
low-income
shared medical appointments
underserved.
Journal
Current diabetes reviews
ISSN: 1875-6417
Titre abrégé: Curr Diabetes Rev
Pays: United Arab Emirates
ID NLM: 101253260
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
04
06
2018
revised:
05
11
2018
accepted:
07
11
2018
pubmed:
14
11
2018
medline:
8
2
2020
entrez:
14
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prior studies have supported the efficacy of diabetes group visits. However, the benefit of diabetes group visits for low-income and underserved individuals is not clear. The purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review in order to clarify the efficacy of diabetes group visits in low-income and underserved settings. The authors performed a narrative review, categorizing studies into nonrandomized and randomized. A total of 14 studies were identified. Hemoglobin A1c was the most commonly measured outcome, which improved for the majority of group visit participants. Preventive care showed consistent improvement for intervention arms. There were several other study outcomes including metabolic (i.e., blood pressure), behavioral (i.e., exercise), functional (i.e., quality of life), and system-based (i.e., cost). Diabetes group visits for low-income and underserved individuals resulted in superior preventive care but the impact on glycemic control remains unclear.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Prior studies have supported the efficacy of diabetes group visits. However, the benefit of diabetes group visits for low-income and underserved individuals is not clear. The purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review in order to clarify the efficacy of diabetes group visits in low-income and underserved settings.
METHODS
METHODS
The authors performed a narrative review, categorizing studies into nonrandomized and randomized.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies were identified. Hemoglobin A1c was the most commonly measured outcome, which improved for the majority of group visit participants. Preventive care showed consistent improvement for intervention arms. There were several other study outcomes including metabolic (i.e., blood pressure), behavioral (i.e., exercise), functional (i.e., quality of life), and system-based (i.e., cost).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Diabetes group visits for low-income and underserved individuals resulted in superior preventive care but the impact on glycemic control remains unclear.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30421682
pii: CDR-EPUB-94462
doi: 10.2174/1573399814666181112145910
pmc: PMC6511502
mid: NIHMS1004190
doi:
Substances chimiques
Blood Glucose
0
Glycated Hemoglobin A
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
372-381Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : K23 DK110341
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.
Références
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
pubmed: 8628042
Diabetes Educ. 2005 Sep-Oct;31(5):712-8
pubmed: 16203855
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jun;26(11-12):1705-1713
pubmed: 27602873
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2013 Mar;14(3 Suppl 1):35-9
pubmed: 23612212
Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1622-1630
pubmed: 29162582
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):943-50
pubmed: 10895844
Diabetes Care. 2009 Apr;32(4):559-66
pubmed: 19131469
Open J Nurs. 2013 Jul;3(3):314-322
pubmed: 25705572
Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):2147-55
pubmed: 24228660
J Pers Assess. 1995 Apr;64(2):376-83
pubmed: 7722862
Front Public Health. 2013 May 06;1:14
pubmed: 24350183
J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Dec;99(12):1327-36
pubmed: 18229769
J Urban Health. 2012 Aug;89(4):709-16
pubmed: 22447392
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):620-4
pubmed: 17443369
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Jan;14(1):39-44
pubmed: 18197744
Diabetes Care. 2003 May;26(5):1641-2
pubmed: 12716841
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44
pubmed: 15838407
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Dec;43(6):589-599
pubmed: 29047326
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;24(5):589-96
pubmed: 21900443
Diabetes Care. 2003 Jul;26(7):2032-6
pubmed: 12832308
Healthc Policy. 2015 Nov;11(2):27-42
pubmed: 26742114
Diabetes Educ. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):292-302
pubmed: 12728756
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):21-32
pubmed: 22235952
Curr Obes Rep. 2013 Aug 30;2:320-326
pubmed: 24273701
Diabetes Care. 2001 Jan;24(1):16-21
pubmed: 11194219
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1410-5
pubmed: 27503965
West J Nurs Res. 2015 Aug;37(8):1033-61
pubmed: 24709853
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005 May;16(2):315-27
pubmed: 15937395
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):99-106
pubmed: 25107290
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jan;31(1):103-9
pubmed: 22232100
Health Policy. 2011 Feb;99(2):116-23
pubmed: 20724018
J Rural Health. 2005 Fall;21(4):317-21
pubmed: 16294654
Diabetes Care. 2001 Apr;24(4):695-700
pubmed: 11315833
Psychol Rep. 1990 Dec;67(3 Pt 2):1091-100
pubmed: 2084735
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2012 Dec;24(12):735-43
pubmed: 23190131
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2018;14(3):227-236
pubmed: 28164750
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2012 Jan;24(1):43-51
pubmed: 22243680
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Feb;42(1):96-107
pubmed: 26647415
Diabetes Care. 1994 Sep;17(9):994-1001
pubmed: 7988321
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):w1-16
pubmed: 19008253
Clin Diabetes. 2018 Jul;36(3):226-231
pubmed: 30078942
Top Health Inf Manage. 2003 Jan-Mar;24(1):8-14
pubmed: 12674390
Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724-35
pubmed: 3393032
Nurs Res. 2013 Mar-Apr;62(2):106-14
pubmed: 23458908
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jul;103(7):e74-82
pubmed: 23678926
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Jan 12;3:2
pubmed: 15644146
Trials. 2011 Jun 09;12:145
pubmed: 21658262
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Mar-Apr;33(2):309-14
pubmed: 17426306
CMAJ. 2013 Sep 17;185(13):E635-44
pubmed: 23939218
Diabetes Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;36(6):936-44
pubmed: 20974905
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(23):833-885
pubmed: 27820218
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Jun 01;17(6 Spec No.):e212-4
pubmed: 21756014