Survival Outcomes in Patients With Previously Untreated BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma Treated With Nivolumab Therapy: Three-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
/ adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ adverse effects
Dacarbazine
/ adverse effects
Disease Progression
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Male
Melanoma
/ drug therapy
Middle Aged
Nivolumab
/ adverse effects
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
/ genetics
Skin Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2019
01 02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
14
11
2018
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
14
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This analysis provides long-term follow-up in patients with BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma receiving first-line therapy based on anti-programmed cell death 1 receptor inhibitors. To compare the 3-year survival with nivolumab vs that with dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma. This follow-up of a randomized phase 3 trial analyzed 3-year overall survival data from the randomized, controlled, double-blind CheckMate 066 phase 3 clinical trial. For this ongoing, multicenter academic institution trial, patients were enrolled from January 2013 through February 2014. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with confirmed unresectable previously untreated stage III or IV melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 but without a BRAF mutation. Patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxic events with nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). Overall survival. At minimum follow-ups of 38.4 months among 210 participants in the nivolumab group (median age, 64 years [range, 18-86 years]; 57.6% male) and 38.5 months among 208 participants in the dacarbazine group (median age, 66 years [range, 25-87 years]; 60.1% male), 3-year overall survival rates were 51.2% (95% CI, 44.1%-57.9%) and 21.6% (95% CI, 16.1%-27.6%), respectively. The median overall survival was 37.5 months (95% CI, 25.5 months-not reached) in the nivolumab group and 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.6-13.0 months) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59; P < .001). Complete and partial responses, respectively, were reported for 19.0% (40 of 210) and 23.8% (50 of 210) of patients in the nivolumab group compared with 1.4% (3 of 208) and 13.0% (27 of 208) of patients in the dacarbazine group. Additional analyses were performed on outcomes with subsequent therapies. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 15.0% (31 of 206) of nivolumab-treated patients and in 17.6% (36 of 205) of dacarbazine-treated patients. There were no deaths due to study drug toxic effects. Nivolumab led to improved 3-year overall survival vs dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01721772.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30422243
pii: 2707224
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4514
pmc: PMC6439558
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Dacarbazine
7GR28W0FJI
BRAF protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
EC 2.7.11.1
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01721772']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
187-194Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):208-222
pubmed: 27913228
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1558-1568
pubmed: 27622997
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1345-1356
pubmed: 28889792
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
Ann Oncol. 2013 Aug;24(8):2174-80
pubmed: 23666915
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2521-32
pubmed: 25891173
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375-84
pubmed: 25795410
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862
pubmed: 28822576
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;3(11):1511-1519
pubmed: 28662232
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):383-390
pubmed: 28671856
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):908-18
pubmed: 26115796
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2006-17
pubmed: 25891304