CT Colonography in Preoperative Staging of Colon Cancer: Evaluation of FOxTROT Inclusion Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Colonic Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Colonography, Computed Tomographic
Contrast Media
Humans
Iohexol
Male
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Neoplasm Invasiveness
/ diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm Staging
Predictive Value of Tests
Preoperative Care
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
CT
CT colonography
cancer staging
colon cancer
neoadjuvant therapy
Journal
AJR. American journal of roentgenology
ISSN: 1546-3141
Titre abrégé: AJR Am J Roentgenol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7708173
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
14
11
2018
medline:
24
10
2019
entrez:
14
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of and interreader agreement for CT colonography (CTC) in the local staging of colon cancer, with emphasis given to the FOxTROT (Fluoropyrimidine, Oxaliplatin, and Targeted-Receptor pre-Operative Therapy [Panitumumab]) trial inclusion criteria, which propose a new tailored treatment paradigm for colon cancer that uses neoadjuvant therapy for patients with a high-risk of locoregional disease as determined by imaging. This biinstitutional retrospective study involved 89 patients (with 93 tumors) who had colon cancer and underwent presurgical CTC. Two radiologists reviewed the CTC studies for local staging, including measurement of the tumor beyond the muscularis propria on a true orthogonal plane. Histopathologic findings for surgical colectomy specimens served as the reference standard for local pathologic staging. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for local determination of the T category, N category, and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) were calculated separately for each reader. High-risk T category tumors were the same as those as used in the FOxTROT trial. Interreader agreement was assessed using the kappa statistic. Thirty-five of 93 tumors (37.6%) were histologically classified as high-risk tumors (T3c, T3d, or T4 tumors). The interreader agreement was substantial (κ = 0.68) for classifying high-risk tumors with the use of CTC, moderate for differentiating N0 from N1 and N2 (κ = 0.44), and slight for detecting EMVI (κ = 0.15). The diagnostic statistics for CTC for the two readers were as follows: for detection of high-risk tumors, sensitivity was 65.7% and 82.9%, and specificity was 81.0% and 87.9%; for detection of N category-positive disease, sensitivity was 50.9% and 69.8%, and specificity was 50.0% and 72.5%; and for detection of EMVI, sensitivity was 18.2% and 66.7%, and specificity was 60.0% and 91.7%. The present study shows that CTC might be a feasible imaging modality for preoperative local staging of higher-risk colon cancers for which neoadjuvant chemotherapy is more suitable on the basis of the FOxTROT trial criteria. However, further studies are required to allow a better generalization of our results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30422707
doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19928
pmc: PMC7959265
mid: NIHMS1668251
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Iohexol
4419T9MX03
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
94-102Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Nov;207(5):984-995
pubmed: 27490941
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):5-12
pubmed: 26611110
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jul 14;113(2):212-9
pubmed: 26079302
Chirurg. 2013 Oct 13;:
pubmed: 24122133
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):438-44
pubmed: 21689323
Abdom Imaging. 2014 Oct;39(5):941-8
pubmed: 24811763
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 22;106(10):
pubmed: 25249540
Br J Surg. 2010 Sep;97(9):1407-15
pubmed: 20564305
Acta Radiol. 2013 Sep;54(7):722-30
pubmed: 23550186
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 May;60(123):432-8
pubmed: 23321007
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009 Sep;7(8):778-831
pubmed: 19755046
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jun;51(6):882-90
pubmed: 18330647
Br J Surg. 2007 Oct;94(10):1285-92
pubmed: 17661309
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30
pubmed: 29313949
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009 Sep;7(8):838-81
pubmed: 19755047
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jul 27;7(7):116-22
pubmed: 26225194
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 20;32(15):1554-62
pubmed: 24752056
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 May;30(5):691-6
pubmed: 25722102
Acad Radiol. 2013 May;20(5):590-5
pubmed: 23477825
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug 21;22(31):7157-65
pubmed: 27610025
Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):711-7; discussion 717-8
pubmed: 15383798
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):835-44
pubmed: 20692872
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jun;51(6):875-81
pubmed: 18350337
Clin Radiol. 2010 Sep;65(9):708-19
pubmed: 20696298
Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):438-443
pubmed: 27215142
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Apr;60(4):385-392
pubmed: 28267005
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;49(2):202-8
pubmed: 24279811
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):17-22
pubmed: 25372703
Singapore Med J. 2014 Dec;55(12):660-6
pubmed: 25630322
Clin Radiol. 2017 Apr;72(4):307-315
pubmed: 28159328
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Nov;13(11):1152-60
pubmed: 23017669
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jun 6;116(12):1513-1519
pubmed: 28449006
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;46(7-8):887-94
pubmed: 21504379
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1465-1475
pubmed: 29043428
Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):83-90
pubmed: 14990815
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 1;29(28):3753-60
pubmed: 21876084
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jan;33(1):9-17
pubmed: 29116438