aCGH Analysis of Predictive Biomarkers for Response to Bevacizumab plus Oxaliplatin- or Irinotecan-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ pharmacology
Bevacizumab
/ pharmacology
Biomarkers
/ metabolism
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Comparative Genomic Hybridization
/ methods
Female
Humans
Irinotecan
/ pharmacology
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Oxaliplatin
/ pharmacology
Prognosis
Survival Analysis
Bevacizumab
Colorectal cancer
Irinotecan
Oxaliplatin
aCGH analysis
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
27
02
2018
accepted:
05
09
2018
pubmed:
15
11
2018
medline:
4
6
2020
entrez:
15
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The randomized phase III study (WJOG4407G) showed equivalent efficacy between FOLFOX and FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied whole genome copy number profiles using array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis of tumor tissue samples obtained in this study. The aim of this study was to identify gene copy number alterations that could aid in selecting either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab for patients with mCRC. DNA was purified from 154 pretreatment formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples (75 from the FOLFOX arm and 79 from the FOLFIRI arm) of 395 patients enrolled in the WJOG4407G trial and analyzed by aCGH. Genomic regions greater than 1.2-fold were regarded as copy number gain (CNG). Patient characteristics between the treatment arms were well balanced except for tumor laterality (left side; 64% in FOLFOX arm and 80% in FOLFIRI arm, Chromosome 8q24.1-q24.2 may contain genes that could potentially serve as predictive markers for selecting either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab for treatment of patients with mCRC. Bevacizumab has been used as a standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in combination with either oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Until now, there has been no predictive marker to choose between the two combination chemotherapies. This array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis revealed that the difference in therapeutic effect between the two combination chemotherapies is prominent in patients with mCRC with gene copy number gain in chromosome 8p24.1-p24.2. Such patients showed more favorable response and survival when treated with irinotecan-based combination chemotherapy. Overlapping genes commonly found in this region may be predictive biomarkers of the efficacy of the combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The randomized phase III study (WJOG4407G) showed equivalent efficacy between FOLFOX and FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied whole genome copy number profiles using array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis of tumor tissue samples obtained in this study. The aim of this study was to identify gene copy number alterations that could aid in selecting either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab for patients with mCRC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
DNA was purified from 154 pretreatment formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples (75 from the FOLFOX arm and 79 from the FOLFIRI arm) of 395 patients enrolled in the WJOG4407G trial and analyzed by aCGH. Genomic regions greater than 1.2-fold were regarded as copy number gain (CNG).
RESULTS
Patient characteristics between the treatment arms were well balanced except for tumor laterality (left side; 64% in FOLFOX arm and 80% in FOLFIRI arm,
CONCLUSION
Chromosome 8q24.1-q24.2 may contain genes that could potentially serve as predictive markers for selecting either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab for treatment of patients with mCRC.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
Bevacizumab has been used as a standard first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in combination with either oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Until now, there has been no predictive marker to choose between the two combination chemotherapies. This array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis revealed that the difference in therapeutic effect between the two combination chemotherapies is prominent in patients with mCRC with gene copy number gain in chromosome 8p24.1-p24.2. Such patients showed more favorable response and survival when treated with irinotecan-based combination chemotherapy. Overlapping genes commonly found in this region may be predictive biomarkers of the efficacy of the combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30425180
pii: theoncologist.2018-0119
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0119
pmc: PMC6519767
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Oxaliplatin
04ZR38536J
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Irinotecan
7673326042
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
327-337Informations de copyright
© AlphaMed Press 2018.
Références
Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 Dec;8(12):976-90
pubmed: 19029958
Semin Cancer Biol. 2006 Aug;16(4):318-30
pubmed: 16934487
Mol Cancer. 2010 May 06;9:100
pubmed: 20459617
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27988
pubmed: 22132187
Oncogene. 2015 Jan 8;34(2):199-208
pubmed: 24362523
Carcinogenesis. 2004 Aug;25(8):1345-57
pubmed: 15001537
Cancer Res. 1998 Jan 15;58(2):283-9
pubmed: 9443406
BMC Cancer. 2013 Oct 29;13:505
pubmed: 24165089
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 02;9(4):e92553
pubmed: 24694993
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 09;15:242
pubmed: 25886454
J Pathol. 2010 Aug;221(4):411-24
pubmed: 20593488
Int J Cancer. 2014 Nov 1;135(9):2065-76
pubmed: 24643999
Genomics. 2005 Feb;85(2):280-3
pubmed: 15676287
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2335-42
pubmed: 15175435
J Pathol. 2010 Feb;220(3):338-47
pubmed: 19911421
Br J Cancer. 2003 Nov 3;89(9):1757-65
pubmed: 14583781
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1539-46
pubmed: 27177863
Mol Cancer. 2014 Aug 29;13:200
pubmed: 25174825
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3706-12
pubmed: 15867200
Neoplasma. 2015;62(6):881-6
pubmed: 26458320
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0144708
pubmed: 26678268