Iatrogenic endometriosis harbors somatic cancer-driver mutations.
Adult
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Canada
Carcinogenesis
/ genetics
Disease Progression
Endometriosis
/ etiology
Endometrium
/ pathology
Female
Germany
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Humans
Iatrogenic Disease
Middle Aged
Mutation
Neoplasms
/ genetics
Netherlands
Retrospective Studies
Signal Transduction
/ genetics
Journal
Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1460-2350
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8701199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jan 2019
01 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
25
04
2018
accepted:
01
11
2018
pubmed:
15
11
2018
medline:
14
8
2019
entrez:
15
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Does incisional endometriosis (IE) harbor somatic cancer-driver mutations? We found that approximately one-quarter of IE cases harbor somatic-cancer mutations, which commonly affect components of the MAPK/RAS or PI3K-Akt-mTor signaling pathways. Despite the classification of endometriosis as a benign gynecological disease, it shares key features with cancers such as resistance to apoptosis and stimulation of angiogenesis and is well-established as the precursor of clear cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas. Our group has recently shown that deep infiltrating endometriosis (DE), a form of endometriosis that rarely undergoes malignant transformation, harbors recurrent somatic mutations. In a retrospective study comparing iatrogenically induced and endogenously occurring forms of endometriosis unlikely to progress to cancer, we examined endometriosis specimens from 40 women with IE and 36 women with DE. Specimens were collected between 2004 and 2017 from five hospital sites in either Canada, Germany or the Netherlands. IE and DE cohorts were age-matched and all women presented with histologically typical endometriosis without known history of malignancy. Archival tissue specimens containing endometriotic lesions were macrodissected and/or laser-capture microdissected to enrich endometriotic stroma and epithelium and a hypersensitive cancer hotspot sequencing panel was used to assess for presence of somatic mutations. Mutations were subsequently validated using droplet digital PCR. PTEN and ARID1A immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed as surrogates for somatic events resulting in functional loss of respective proteins. Overall, we detected somatic cancer-driver events in 11 of 40 (27.5%) IE cases and 13 of 36 (36.1%) DE cases, including hotspot mutations in KRAS, ERBB2, PIK3CA and CTNNB1. Heterogeneous PTEN loss occurred at similar rates in IE and DE (7/40 vs 5/36, respectively), whereas ARID1A loss only occurred in a single case of DE. While rates of detectable somatic cancer-driver events between IE and DE are not statistically significant (P > 0.05), KRAS activating mutations were more prevalent in DE. Detection of somatic cancer-driver events were limited to hotspots analyzed in our panel-based sequencing assay and loss of protein expression by IHC from archival tissue. Whole genome or exome sequencing, or epigenetic analysis may uncover additional somatic alterations. Moreover, because of the descriptive nature of this study, the functional roles of identified mutations within the context of endometriosis remain unclear and causality cannot be established. The alterations we report may be important in driving the growth and survival of endometriosis in ectopic regions of the body. Given the frequency of mutation in surgically displaced endometrium (IE), examination of similar somatic events in eutopic endometrium, as well as clinically annotated cases of other forms of endometriosis, in particular endometriomas that are most commonly linked to malignancy, is warranted. This study was funded by a Canadian Cancer Society Impact Grant [701603, PI Huntsman], Canadian Institutes of Health Research Transitional Open Operating Grant [MOP-142273, PI Yong], the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Grant [FDN-154290, PI Huntsman], the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant [PJT-156084, PIs Yong and Anglesio], and the Janet D. Cottrelle Foundation through the BC Cancer Foundation [PI Huntsman]. D.G. Huntsman is a co-founder and shareholder of Contextual Genomics Inc., a for profit company that provides clinical reporting to assist in cancer patient treatment. R. Aguirre-Hernandez, J. Khattra and L.M. Prentice have a patent MOLECULAR QUALITY ASSURANCE METHODS FOR USE IN SEQUENCING pending and are current (or former) employees of Contextual Genomics Inc. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare. Not applicable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30428062
pii: 5181596
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey332
pmc: PMC6296213
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
69-78Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP-142273
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FDN-154290
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : PJT-156084
Pays : Canada
Références
PLoS One. 2008 Mar 05;3(3):e1710
pubmed: 18320031
Hum Reprod. 2003 Jun;18(6):1323-7
pubmed: 12773467
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Nov;140(5):1189-90
pubmed: 20951262
Hum Reprod. 2007 Jan;22(1):266-71
pubmed: 16936305
PLoS Genet. 2018 Jan 4;14(1):e1007108
pubmed: 29300727
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014 May;10(5):261-75
pubmed: 24366116
Fertil Steril. 2011 Aug;96(2):366-373.e8
pubmed: 21718982
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 May;42(2):218-20
pubmed: 12069156
J Pathol Clin Res. 2018 Jul;4(3):154-166
pubmed: 29659191
Cancer Cell. 2007 Apr;11(4):321-33
pubmed: 17418409
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D777-D783
pubmed: 27899578
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):268-79
pubmed: 19144942
Oncogene. 1995 Jun 1;10(11):2207-12
pubmed: 7784065
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Apr;13(4):385-94
pubmed: 22361336
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Oct 13;11(11):761-74
pubmed: 21993244
Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):315-324
pubmed: 27920089
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 14;363(16):1532-43
pubmed: 20942669
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Mar;955:89-100; discussion 118, 396-406
pubmed: 11949968
J Pathol. 2011 Jun;224(2):261-9
pubmed: 21480232
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014 Dec;13(12):928-42
pubmed: 25435214
Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):263-8
pubmed: 17094974
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;60(4):711-727
pubmed: 28990985
Aging Cell. 2017 Dec;16(6):1208-1218
pubmed: 28994177
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Aug;9(8):550-62
pubmed: 19629070
Fertil Steril. 2004 Oct;82(4):878-84
pubmed: 15482763
Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 27;6:6118
pubmed: 25625625
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1835-1848
pubmed: 28489996
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 Nov;98(11):751-767
pubmed: 28652096
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Jan;17(1):95-106
pubmed: 25096191
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Sep;152(1):83-5
pubmed: 20510495
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2389-98
pubmed: 20573927
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 Jan-Feb;16(1):432-5
pubmed: 16445672
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1095-1102
pubmed: 29742675
Mol Cancer Res. 2009 Jun;7(6):799-808
pubmed: 19509115
Nat Med. 2005 Jan;11(1):63-70
pubmed: 15619626
Hum Reprod. 2012 May;27(5):1292-9
pubmed: 22422778
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011 Dec;24(6):376-9
pubmed: 21906976
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 28;7(1):6765
pubmed: 28754906
J Pathol. 2015 Jun;236(2):201-9
pubmed: 25692284
Mol Cancer Res. 2015 Apr;13(4):659-69
pubmed: 25548100
Am J Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 15;5(11):3339-49
pubmed: 26807315
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):6005-10
pubmed: 27152024
Oncogene. 2008 May 1;27(20):2801-9
pubmed: 18193093
PLoS Med. 2016 Dec 27;13(12):e1002206
pubmed: 28027320
Nat Genet. 2017 Jun;49(6):856-865
pubmed: 28436987
J Pathol Clin Res. 2018 Jul;4(3):149-153
pubmed: 30003713
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Oct;217:34-37
pubmed: 28846863
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005 Oct;31(5):471-5
pubmed: 16176520
Fertil Steril. 2004 Jul;82(1):80-5
pubmed: 15236993