How community pharmacists prioritize cognitive pharmaceutical services.


Journal

Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP
ISSN: 1934-8150
Titre abrégé: Res Social Adm Pharm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231974

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 30 07 2018
revised: 14 09 2018
accepted: 24 09 2018
pubmed: 16 11 2018
medline: 12 5 2020
entrez: 16 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is broad consensus that community pharmacists should focus on the provision of pharmaceutical care. Studies, however, have shown that community pharmacists still spend a considerable amount of time on traditional activities such as dispensing instead of cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPS). It is not clear whether community pharmacists prefer their current time-utilization or if they are willing to spend more time on CPS. The aim of this study was to identify how community pharmacists ideally would prioritize CPS compared to other daily activities. A cross-sectional study design with Q-methodology was used to identify different viewpoints regarding task prioritization. Community pharmacists were asked to rank a total of 48 daily activities. Data was collected online using FlashQ In total, 166 community pharmacists participated in this study. Three distinguishing groups were found based on task prioritization explaining 59% of the total variance among respondents. All groups ranked the provision of CPS as important, in differing degrees. Group 1 ranked CPS as most important and was also the group that contained most participants. Group 2 and 3 ranked quality assurance as most important with CPS as second. Logistics and pharmacy management were ranked low by all groups. Community pharmacists rank the provision of CPS as important. So factors, probably other than task prioritization, are keeping the pharmacist from focusing on CPS in daily practice. In other studies, time constraints are mostly mentioned as major barrier. Activities such as logistics and pharmacy management are given less priority and should be delegated to supporting staff members as much as possible, to enable pharmacists to focus their available time on activities they deem important.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30429104
pii: S1551-7411(18)30704-6
doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.09.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1088-1094

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jeroen M van de Pol (JM)

Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; BENU Apotheken BV, Maarssen, the Netherlands.

Ellen S Koster (ES)

Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Anke M Hövels (AM)

Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Marcel L Bouvy (ML)

Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: m.l.bouvy@uu.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH