An extensive study for binary characterisation of adrenal tumours.
Adrenal tumours
Computed tomography
Hybrid classifier
Optimisation
Tumour classification
Journal
Medical & biological engineering & computing
ISSN: 1741-0444
Titre abrégé: Med Biol Eng Comput
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
04
04
2018
accepted:
25
10
2018
pubmed:
16
11
2018
medline:
26
7
2019
entrez:
16
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
On adrenal glands, benign tumours generally change the hormone equilibrium, and malign tumours usually tend to spread to the nearby tissues and to the organs of the immune system. These features can give a trace about the type of adrenal tumours; however, they cannot be observed all the time. Different tumour types can be confused in terms of having a similar shape, size and intensity features on scans. To support the evaluation process, biopsy process is applied that includes injury and complication risks. In this study, we handle the binary characterisation of adrenal tumours by using dynamic computed tomography images. Concerning this, the usage of one more imaging modalities and biopsy process is wanted to be excluded. The used dataset consists of 8 subtypes of adrenal tumours, and it seemed as the worst-case scenario in which all handicaps are available against tumour classification. Histogram, grey level co-occurrence matrix and wavelet-based features are investigated to reveal the most effective one on the identification of adrenal tumours. Binary classification is proposed utilising four-promising algorithms that have proven oneself on the task of binary-medical pattern classification. For this purpose, optimised neural networks are examined using six dataset inspired by the aforementioned features, and an efficient framework is offered before the use of a biopsy. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC are used to evaluate the performance of classifiers. Consequently, malign/benign characterisation is performed by proposed framework, with success rates of 80.7%, 75%, 82.22% and 78.61% for the metrics, respectively. Graphical abstract.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30430422
doi: 10.1007/s11517-018-1923-z
pii: 10.1007/s11517-018-1923-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
849-862Références
Comput Biol Med. 2007 Apr;37(4):486-98
pubmed: 17054933
Eur Urol. 2009 Feb;55(2):518-21
pubmed: 18818011
J Emerg Med. 2010 May;38(4):484-9
pubmed: 19232878
Comput Biol Med. 2010 Apr;40(4):430-7
pubmed: 20227068
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2011;2(7):172-4
pubmed: 22096718
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Oct;26(5):891-7
pubmed: 23344259
Comput Biol Med. 2016 May 1;72:43-53
pubmed: 27015322
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017 Feb;139:31-38
pubmed: 28187893
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Apr;31(2):262-274
pubmed: 29067570