Bladder Preservation With Twice-a-Day Radiation Plus Fluorouracil/Cisplatin or Once Daily Radiation Plus Gemcitabine for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: NRG/RTOG 0712-A Randomized Phase II Trial.


Journal

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 01 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 16 11 2018
medline: 29 10 2019
entrez: 16 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Fluorouracil plus cisplatin and radiation twice a day (FCT) is an established chemoradiation (CRT) regimen for selective bladder-sparing treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Gemcitabine and once daily radiation (GD) is a well-supported alternative. The current trial evaluates these regimens. Patients with cT2-4a muscle-invasive bladder cancer were randomly assigned to FCT or GD. Patients underwent transurethral resection and induction CRT to 40 Gy. Patients who achieved a complete response (CR) received consolidation CRT to 64 Gy and others underwent cystectomy. We administered adjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy. The primary end point was the rate of freedom from distant metastasis at 3 years (DMF3). The trial was not statistically powered to compare regimens, but to assess whether either regimen exceeded a DMF3 benchmark of 75%. Toxicity and efficacy end points, including CR and bladder-intact distant metastasis free survival at 3 years (BI-DMFS3), were assessed. From December 2008 to April 2014, 70 patients were enrolled, of which 66 were eligible for analysis, 33 per arm. Median follow-up was 5.1 years (range, 0.4 to 7.8 years) for eligible living patients. DMF3 was 78% and 84% for FCT and GD, respectively. BI-DMFS3 was 67% and 72%, respectively. Postinduction CR rates were 88% and 78%, respectively. Of 33 patients in the FCT arm, 21 (64%) experienced treatment-related grade 3 and 4 toxicities during protocol treatment, with 18 (55%), two (6%), and two patients (6%) experiencing grade 3 and 4 hematologic, GI, and genitourinary toxicity, respectively. For the 33 patients in the GD arm, these figures were 18 (55%) overall and 14 (42%), three (9%) and two patients (6%), respectively. Both regimens demonstrated DMF3 greater than 75%. There were fewer toxicities observed in the GD arm. Either gemcitabine and once daily radiation or a cisplatin-based regimen could serve as a base for future trials of systemic therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30433852
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00537
pmc: PMC6354769
doi:

Substances chimiques

Deoxycytidine 0W860991D6
Cisplatin Q20Q21Q62J
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT
Gemcitabine 0

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

44-51

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180822
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180868
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA189867
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn

Références

J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jul 15;20(14):3061-71
pubmed: 12118019
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):705-11
pubmed: 22101114
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Feb 1;88(2):326-31
pubmed: 24411604
Oncologist. 2000;5(6):471-6
pubmed: 11110598
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Aug;14(9):863-72
pubmed: 23823157
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2540-5
pubmed: 15226322
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3801-9
pubmed: 25366678
J Chronic Dis. 1974 Sep;27(7-8):365-75
pubmed: 4612056
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Sep;13(9):621-625
pubmed: 28796558
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):462-475
pubmed: 27375033
Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):823-9
pubmed: 23200811
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jun 1;74(2):511-7
pubmed: 18977098
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 20;29(6):733-8
pubmed: 21205754
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 1;19(3):666-75
pubmed: 11157016
Radiother Oncol. 2005 Apr;75(1):34-43
pubmed: 15878099
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Feb 1;61(2):420-5
pubmed: 15667962
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 19;366(16):1477-88
pubmed: 22512481
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Dec 1;57(5):1310-6
pubmed: 14630267

Auteurs

John J Coen (JJ)

1 21st Century Oncology, Providence, RI.

Peixin Zhang (P)

2 NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA.

Philip J Saylor (PJ)

3 Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Cheryl T Lee (CT)

4 Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Chin-Lee Wu (CL)

3 Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

William Parker (W)

5 McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Timothy Lautenschlaeger (T)

6 Indiana University Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN.

Anthony L Zietman (AL)

3 Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Jason A Efstathiou (JA)

3 Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Ashesh B Jani (AB)

7 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Omer Kucuk (O)

7 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Luis Souhami (L)

5 McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Joseph P Rodgers (JP)

2 NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA.

Howard M Sandler (HM)

7 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

William U Shipley (WU)

3 Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH