Interpreting physical and mental metaphors: Is Theory of Mind associated with pragmatics in middle childhood?
experimental pragmatics
figurative language
pragmatics
Journal
Journal of child language
ISSN: 1469-7602
Titre abrégé: J Child Lang
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0425743
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
18
11
2018
medline:
7
2
2020
entrez:
17
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We investigated the association between individual differences in metaphor understanding and Theory of Mind (ToM) in typically developing children. We distinguished between two types of metaphors and created a Physical and Mental Metaphors task, echoing a similar distinction for ToM. Nine-year-olds scored lower than older age-groups in ToM as well as in the interpretation of mental, but not physical, metaphors. Moreover, nine-year-olds (but not older children) who are better in ToM are also better in interpreting mental, but not physical, metaphors. This suggests that the link between metaphor and ToM is stronger when metaphorical interpretation involves mental aspects, and it is more evident in early rather than later childhood.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30442207
pii: S030500091800048X
doi: 10.1017/S030500091800048X
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM