Emergency department imaging superusers.
Emergency department
Imaging
Radiology
Superuser
Utilization
Journal
Emergency radiology
ISSN: 1438-1435
Titre abrégé: Emerg Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9431227
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
25
08
2018
accepted:
09
11
2018
pubmed:
18
11
2018
medline:
23
4
2019
entrez:
17
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify and characterize the most frequent users of emergency department (ED) imaging. All patients with at least one ED visit in 2016 across a four-hospital healthcare system were retrospectively identified and their ED imaging utilization characterized. Overall, 126,940 unique patients underwent 187,603 ED visits (mean 1.5 ± 1.7) and a total of 192,142 imaging examinations (mean 1.7 ± 2.7). Fifty-eight percent of patients were imaged (73,672) and underwent a mean 2.6 ± 2.7 exams. When ranked by ED visits, 1.6% (2007) of patients had ≥ 4 ED visits (mean 6.1 ± 5.4). These ED "clinical superusers" accounted for 7.7% (14,409) of total ED visits and underwent 6.8 ± 5.4 imaging examinations, while non-superusers underwent 1.5 ± 2.2 (p < 0.01). When ranked by ED imaging utilization, 12.3% (15,575) of patients underwent ≥ 4 ED imaging examinations and consumed 49.5% (95,053) of all imaging services. A subset of just 1.3% (1608) of ED patients underwent > 10 annual ED examinations (ED "imaging superusers") and accounted for 12.4% (23,787) of all ED imaging services. Only 0.4% (n = 472) of patients were both clinical and imaging superusers. Despite similar ED visits to clinical superusers (6.0 ± 5.6 vs. 6.1 ± 5.4, p = 0.92), imaging superusers underwent significantly more imaging (14.8 ± 4.8 vs. 6.8 ± 5.4 examinations, p < 0.01). Just 12% of ED patients consume 50% of all ED imaging services, and 1.3% consume 12.4%. These ED imaging superusers represent a distinct group from clinical superusers. Prospective identification of this newly described subgroup might permit targeted interventions to control ED imaging volume, restrain costs, and minimize per-patient radiation exposure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30443737
doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1659-y
pii: 10.1007/s10140-018-1659-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
161-168Références
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Jun;7(6):637-46
pubmed: 10905642
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Mar;41(3):309-18
pubmed: 12605196
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1311-7
pubmed: 15576522
J Emerg Nurs. 2005 Apr;31(2):139-44
pubmed: 15834378
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;48(1):1-8
pubmed: 16781914
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;48(1):9-16
pubmed: 16781915
Emerg Med J. 2007 Jun;24(6):398-401
pubmed: 17513534
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):609-16
pubmed: 19538503
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):42-8
pubmed: 20346540
JAMA. 2010 Aug 11;304(6):664-70
pubmed: 20699458
Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Aug 6;(26):1-31
pubmed: 20726217
JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):1978-85
pubmed: 21586713
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):41-52.e42
pubmed: 21689565
Neth J Med. 2011 Sep;69(9):392-8
pubmed: 21978983
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):24-32
pubmed: 22305330
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):679-686.e3
pubmed: 22727201
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 10;173(11):1024-6
pubmed: 23609029
Emerg Radiol. 2014 Feb;21(1):5-10
pubmed: 24197655
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):221-30
pubmed: 24201027
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jul;31(7):526-532
pubmed: 24473411
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Nov;11(11):1044-7
pubmed: 25439619
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Sep;13(9):1044-1049.e1
pubmed: 27162040
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;34(11):2127-2131
pubmed: 27592724
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 20;16(1):594
pubmed: 27765045
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):680-683
pubmed: 29306644
Am J Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;16(7):648-52
pubmed: 9827738