Factors Impacting Perceived Access to Early Prenatal Care among Pregnant Veterans Enrolled in the Department of Veterans Affairs.


Journal

Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
ISSN: 1878-4321
Titre abrégé: Womens Health Issues
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9101000

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 16 05 2018
revised: 25 09 2018
accepted: 04 10 2018
pubmed: 18 11 2018
medline: 16 4 2019
entrez: 18 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite the relatively recent Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) policy advances in providing care for veterans and their infants during the perinatal period, little information exists regarding access to prenatal care for women veterans. Currently, VA medical centers do not provide onsite pregnancy care for veterans, but pay for care from community obstetricians through the Veterans Choice Program (VCP) and related non-VA care programs. The VCP is subcontracted to two large contractors, Health Net and TriWest, to assist the VA in administering the VCP. To date, no studies have evaluated women's perceived access to prenatal care under the VCP. The purpose of this study was to understand pregnant veterans' perceived access to community prenatal care through the VCP. The Center for Maternal and Infant Outcomes Research in Translation (COMFORT) study is a longitudinal, prospective multisite observational cohort study of pregnant and postpartum veterans at 15 VA facilities nationwide. Telephone surveys were conducted with women veterans at 20 weeks of pregnancy. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the odds of receiving care early enough adjusted for these key factors. Measures included perceived access to early prenatal care by race, age, marital status, history of mental health conditions, urban/rural residence, and the VCP contractor (Health Net vs. TriWest). Overall, 519 women veterans completed the baseline pregnancy survey. A sizeable proportion of participants reported a history of mental health conditions, including depression (56.7%), anxiety disorder (45.5%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (40.5%). White veterans were more likely to report perceived timely access to prenatal care than minority veterans (66% vs. 52%; p = .0038). Veterans receiving care at Health Net facilities were more likely to report receiving prenatal care as early as desired in comparison to veterans at TriWest facilities (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.73), whereas veterans with a history of depression were 1.7 times more likely to report perceived delays in desired prenatal care compared with veterans without a history of depression (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.08-2.53). We found that nearly one-third of women reported problems receiving early prenatal care as soon as they would have liked. Women with histories of depression and racial minorities may require additional maternity care coordination services to ensure they receive timely prenatal care. Community-based provider networks under the VCP should continue to be expanded so that pregnant veterans are able to access high-quality prenatal care in a timely manner.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Despite the relatively recent Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) policy advances in providing care for veterans and their infants during the perinatal period, little information exists regarding access to prenatal care for women veterans. Currently, VA medical centers do not provide onsite pregnancy care for veterans, but pay for care from community obstetricians through the Veterans Choice Program (VCP) and related non-VA care programs. The VCP is subcontracted to two large contractors, Health Net and TriWest, to assist the VA in administering the VCP. To date, no studies have evaluated women's perceived access to prenatal care under the VCP.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to understand pregnant veterans' perceived access to community prenatal care through the VCP.
DESIGN
The Center for Maternal and Infant Outcomes Research in Translation (COMFORT) study is a longitudinal, prospective multisite observational cohort study of pregnant and postpartum veterans at 15 VA facilities nationwide. Telephone surveys were conducted with women veterans at 20 weeks of pregnancy. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the odds of receiving care early enough adjusted for these key factors. Measures included perceived access to early prenatal care by race, age, marital status, history of mental health conditions, urban/rural residence, and the VCP contractor (Health Net vs. TriWest).
RESULTS
Overall, 519 women veterans completed the baseline pregnancy survey. A sizeable proportion of participants reported a history of mental health conditions, including depression (56.7%), anxiety disorder (45.5%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (40.5%). White veterans were more likely to report perceived timely access to prenatal care than minority veterans (66% vs. 52%; p = .0038). Veterans receiving care at Health Net facilities were more likely to report receiving prenatal care as early as desired in comparison to veterans at TriWest facilities (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.73), whereas veterans with a history of depression were 1.7 times more likely to report perceived delays in desired prenatal care compared with veterans without a history of depression (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.08-2.53).
CONCLUSIONS
We found that nearly one-third of women reported problems receiving early prenatal care as soon as they would have liked. Women with histories of depression and racial minorities may require additional maternity care coordination services to ensure they receive timely prenatal care. Community-based provider networks under the VCP should continue to be expanded so that pregnant veterans are able to access high-quality prenatal care in a timely manner.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30446330
pii: S1049-3867(18)30299-8
doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.10.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

56-63

Subventions

Organisme : HSRD VA
ID : IK2 HX001540
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Kristin M Mattocks (KM)

VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds, Massachusetts; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. Electronic address: Kristin.Mattocks@va.gov.

Rebecca Baldor (R)

VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds, Massachusetts.

Bevanne Bean-Mayberry (B)

VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Michael Cucciare (M)

Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Little Rock, Arkansas; VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Central Arkansas Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Little Rock, Arkansas; Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Megan R Gerber (MR)

VA Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Karen M Goldstein (KM)

Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Kimberly D Hammer (KD)

Fargo VA Health Care System, Fargo, North Dakota; Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Dakota School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Grand Forks, North Dakota.

Elizabeth E Hill (EE)

VA Sierra Nevada Health Care System, Reno, Nevada.

Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers (A)

VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds, Massachusetts; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.

Allan V Prochazka (AV)

Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.

Anne G Sadler (AG)

Center for Research in the Implementation of Innovative Strategies in Practice (CRIISP), Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

Lori Bastian (L)

VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut; Department of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH