High-Dose Infliximab Rescue Therapy for Hospitalized Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Does Not Improve Colectomy-Free Survival.
Acute Disease
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Colectomy
/ statistics & numerical data
Colitis, Ulcerative
/ drug therapy
Female
Gastrointestinal Agents
/ administration & dosage
Hospitalization
Humans
Infliximab
/ administration & dosage
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Young Adult
Colectomy
Infliximab
Rescue therapy
Ulcerative colitis
Journal
Digestive diseases and sciences
ISSN: 1573-2568
Titre abrégé: Dig Dis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7902782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
06
03
2018
accepted:
29
10
2018
pubmed:
18
11
2018
medline:
26
3
2019
entrez:
18
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Optimization strategies with infliximab (IFX) are increasingly used as rescue therapy for steroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). We aim to determine if intensified IFX induction improves colectomy rate and identifies outcome predictors. Hospitalized adult patients who received IFX for ASUC between 2010 and 2016 were identified. We compared standard inductions (5 mg/kg) vs high-dose induction (10 mg/kg) with 3-month colectomy rate as primary outcome. Seventy-two patients (62.5% male, median age 38.5) were identified. Thirty-seven patients (51.3%) received 5 mg/kg IFX and 35 received 10 mg/kg. Baseline clinical, biochemical and endoscopic parameters were well matched between these two groups. 10 mg/kg was more likely to be used by clinicians from 2014 onwards (p < 0.001). Three-month colectomy rate was 9.7%; which was not significantly different between the standard (5.4%) and high-dose (14.3%) IFX induction (p = 0.205). CRP ≥ 60 (OR 10.9 [95% CI 1.23-96.50], p = 0.032), hemoglobin ≤ 90 g/L (OR 15.6 [95% CI 2.61-92.66], p = 0.036) and albumin < 30 g/L (OR 9.4 [95% CI 1.06-83.13], p = 0.044) were associated with increased risk of colectomy at 3 months in univariate regression analysis. Use of high-dose infliximab rescue therapy did not improve 3-month colectomy-free survival in this cohort. Tailored use in high-risk patients may be beneficial although further validation is required.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Optimization strategies with infliximab (IFX) are increasingly used as rescue therapy for steroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). We aim to determine if intensified IFX induction improves colectomy rate and identifies outcome predictors.
METHODS
Hospitalized adult patients who received IFX for ASUC between 2010 and 2016 were identified. We compared standard inductions (5 mg/kg) vs high-dose induction (10 mg/kg) with 3-month colectomy rate as primary outcome.
RESULTS
Seventy-two patients (62.5% male, median age 38.5) were identified. Thirty-seven patients (51.3%) received 5 mg/kg IFX and 35 received 10 mg/kg. Baseline clinical, biochemical and endoscopic parameters were well matched between these two groups. 10 mg/kg was more likely to be used by clinicians from 2014 onwards (p < 0.001). Three-month colectomy rate was 9.7%; which was not significantly different between the standard (5.4%) and high-dose (14.3%) IFX induction (p = 0.205). CRP ≥ 60 (OR 10.9 [95% CI 1.23-96.50], p = 0.032), hemoglobin ≤ 90 g/L (OR 15.6 [95% CI 2.61-92.66], p = 0.036) and albumin < 30 g/L (OR 9.4 [95% CI 1.06-83.13], p = 0.044) were associated with increased risk of colectomy at 3 months in univariate regression analysis.
CONCLUSION
Use of high-dose infliximab rescue therapy did not improve 3-month colectomy-free survival in this cohort. Tailored use in high-risk patients may be beneficial although further validation is required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30446928
doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5358-z
pii: 10.1007/s10620-018-5358-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Gastrointestinal Agents
0
Infliximab
B72HH48FLU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
518-523Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Gastroenterology. 2005 Jun;128(7):1805-11
pubmed: 15940615
Gut. 1995 Jun;36(6):897-901
pubmed: 7615280
Gut. 2010 Jan;59(1):49-54
pubmed: 19651627
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Feb 15;24(3):651-659
pubmed: 29462380
Gut. 1996 Jun;38(6):905-10
pubmed: 8984031
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;13(3):531-8
pubmed: 25117777
Can J Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep;19 Suppl A:5A-36A
pubmed: 16151544
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Nov;9(11):972-80
pubmed: 21806954
Lancet. 1974 Jun 1;1(7866):1067-70
pubmed: 4135487
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 May;95(5):1258-62
pubmed: 10811337
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jun;41(11):1094-103
pubmed: 25809869
J Crohns Colitis. 2011 Feb;5(1):28-33
pubmed: 21272801
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Jun 1;11(6):697-705
pubmed: 27838610
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;13(2):330-335.e1
pubmed: 25086187
Gut. 1975 Aug;16(8):579-84
pubmed: 1183857
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Aug;38(4):377-87
pubmed: 23799948
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;13(2):336-8
pubmed: 25285408
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Dec;65(12):1211-28
pubmed: 19756557
Dig Dis. 2010;28(3):501-7
pubmed: 20926879
Gastroenterology. 1985 Nov;89(5):1005-13
pubmed: 3930339
Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):350-5.e2
pubmed: 25917786